LINC vs. META
LINC (Lincoln Educational Services Corporation) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. LINC operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, LINC returned 36.37%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for META. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LINC vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 73.17% return, which is significantly higher than META's -15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed META with an annualized return of 36.37%, while META has yielded a comparatively lower 16.39% annualized return.
LINC
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -20.08%
- 6M
- 56.86%
- YTD
- 73.17%
- 1Y
- 81.51%
- 3Y*
- 79.67%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 36.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
META
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- 6M
- -22.16%
- YTD
- -15.51%
- 1Y
- -25.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.68M | $26.87M | $27.43M | |
| $9.87B | $11.79B | $10.93B |
LINC vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 73.17% | 52.65% | 57.57% | 73.40% | -22.49% | 14.92% | 140.74% | -15.62% | 58.42% | 5.21% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -15.51% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LINC and META is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
LINC:
$1.33B
META:
$1.42T
LINC:
$0.72
META:
$26.51
LINC:
58.42
META:
21.00
LINC:
2.05
META:
0.86
LINC:
2.40
META:
6.27
LINC:
6.59
META:
5.47
LINC:
$544.69M
META:
$228.25B
LINC:
$242.75M
META:
$186.59B
LINC:
$49.04M
META:
$107.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LINC vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
LINC
META
LINC vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LINC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.89 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | -0.84 | +3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | -1.52 | +8.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LINC vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LINC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -76.74% | -22.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.18% | -33.30% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -34.15% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.63% | -76.74% | +36.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.51% | -76.74% | +19.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.89% | -29.30% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.76% | -15.90% | -42.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 18.25% | -6.72% |
Volatility
LINC vs. META - Volatility Comparison
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a higher volatility of 21.08% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 15.37%. This indicates that LINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LINC | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.08% | 15.37% | +5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.39% | 30.29% | +7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.93% | 39.78% | +11.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.00% | 44.68% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.16% | 39.10% | +18.06% |
Dividends
LINC vs. META - Dividend Comparison
LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LINC Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
Financials
LINC vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LINC vs. META - Profitability Comparison
LINC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.47B and revenue of 60.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
LINC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.78B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.
LINC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 15.85B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LINC and META have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LINC has higher volatility (21.08%) compared to META (15.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LINC dropped -99.11% vs META's -76.74%.
LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LINC and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer