PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LINC vs. META
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LINC and META is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

LINC vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
227.15%
1,217.86%
LINC
META

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LINC:

1.69

META:

0.02

Sortino Ratio

LINC:

2.39

META:

0.29

Omega Ratio

LINC:

1.30

META:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

LINC:

1.33

META:

0.02

Martin Ratio

LINC:

7.01

META:

0.07

Ulcer Index

LINC:

10.74%

META:

9.52%

Daily Std Dev

LINC:

44.53%

META:

37.10%

Max Drawdown

LINC:

-99.11%

META:

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

LINC:

-22.33%

META:

-31.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LINC:

$542.76M

META:

$1.27T

EPS

LINC:

$0.32

META:

$23.86

PE Ratio

LINC:

53.69

META:

21.05

PEG Ratio

LINC:

1.71

META:

1.05

PS Ratio

LINC:

1.23

META:

7.74

PB Ratio

LINC:

3.05

META:

7.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

LINC:

$336.70M

META:

$128.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LINC:

$197.96M

META:

$104.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

LINC:

$25.68M

META:

$63.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINC achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than META's -14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, LINC has outperformed META with an annualized return of 22.66%, while META has yielded a comparatively lower 19.79% annualized return.


LINC

YTD

8.60%

1M

14.76%

6M

33.18%

1Y

77.30%

5Y*

48.38%

10Y*

22.66%

META

YTD

-14.28%

1M

-13.89%

6M

-12.93%

1Y

1.85%

5Y*

23.02%

10Y*

19.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LINC vs. META — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LINC is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LINC is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LINC is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LINC is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LINC is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LINC is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

META
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of META is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of META is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of META is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of META is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of META is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of META is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LINC vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LINC, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LINC: 1.69
META: 0.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for LINC, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LINC: 2.39
META: 0.29
The chart of Omega ratio for LINC, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LINC: 1.30
META: 1.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for LINC, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
LINC: 3.40
META: 0.02
The chart of Martin ratio for LINC, currently valued at 7.01, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LINC: 7.01
META: 0.07

The current LINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LINC and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.69
0.02
LINC
META

Dividends

LINC vs. META - Dividend Comparison

LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.43%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.40%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LINC vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINC drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINC and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-7.39%
-31.87%
LINC
META

Volatility

LINC vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is 14.05%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 21.00%. This indicates that LINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.05%
21.00%
LINC
META

Financials

LINC vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab