SIVR vs. GLD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 13.54%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for GLD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.

Performance

SIVR vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -8.44% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 13.54%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.80% annualized return.

SIVR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -13.77%
• YTD: -8.44%
• 6M: -5.58%
• 1Y: 80.34%
• 3Y*: 42.28%
• 5Y*: 19.98%
• 10Y*: 13.54%

GLD

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -7.06%
• YTD: -2.96%
• 6M: -5.79%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: 29.23%
• 5Y*: 18.28%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-8.44%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	-2.96%	63.68%	26.66%	12.69%	-0.77%	-4.15%	24.81%	17.86%	-1.94%	12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and GLD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009	0.79

The correlation between SIVR and GLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIVR vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 36
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GLD

GLD Risk / Return Rank: 24
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIVR	GLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.88	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.24	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.18	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	0.99	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	2.68	+1.04

SIVR vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and GLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIVR	GLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.85%	-45.56%	-30.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.33%	-24.46%	-20.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.33%	-24.46%	-20.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.33%	-24.46%	-20.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.33%	-24.46%	-20.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.14%	-22.45%	-21.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.83%	-16.16%	-31.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.67%	8.97%	+12.70%

Volatility

SIVR vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 8.05%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIVR	GLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.63%	8.05%	+5.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.02%	24.31%	+34.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.12%	27.56%	+32.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.53%	18.22%	+18.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.08%	16.10%	+15.98%

SIVR vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIVR vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIVR nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIVR and GLD in my portfolio?

SIVR and GLD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIVR or GLD?

SIVR has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to GLD (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs GLD's -45.56%.

Which ETF is better, SIVR or GLD?

On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 13.54% vs 11.80% for GLD. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIVR or GLD?

Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIVR or GLD?

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIVR or GLD?

SIVR and GLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SIVR and GLD?

SIVR is categorized as Silver, while GLD is Gold. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.40% for GLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.