PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COST vs. TGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COST and TGT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

COST vs. TGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Target Corporation (TGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
12.86%
-9.56%
COST
TGT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COST:

2.38

TGT:

-0.06

Sortino Ratio

COST:

2.96

TGT:

0.18

Omega Ratio

COST:

1.42

TGT:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

COST:

4.37

TGT:

-0.04

Martin Ratio

COST:

11.30

TGT:

-0.15

Ulcer Index

COST:

3.98%

TGT:

13.55%

Daily Std Dev

COST:

18.85%

TGT:

37.03%

Max Drawdown

COST:

-53.39%

TGT:

-62.96%

Current Drawdown

COST:

-4.01%

TGT:

-46.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COST:

$435.99B

TGT:

$60.30B

EPS

COST:

$16.98

TGT:

$9.43

PE Ratio

COST:

57.84

TGT:

13.96

PEG Ratio

COST:

5.99

TGT:

1.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

COST:

$258.81B

TGT:

$107.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COST:

$32.80B

TGT:

$29.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

COST:

$12.25B

TGT:

$6.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 45.49% return, which is significantly higher than TGT's -5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed TGT with an annualized return of 23.51%, while TGT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.


COST

YTD

45.49%

1M

2.65%

6M

11.01%

1Y

48.60%

5Y*

28.73%

10Y*

23.51%

TGT

YTD

-5.87%

1M

-15.94%

6M

-7.83%

1Y

-2.08%

5Y*

2.51%

10Y*

8.78%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COST vs. TGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Target Corporation (TGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.60-0.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.200.18
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.461.03
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 4.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.73-0.04
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 12.20, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0012.20-0.15
COST
TGT

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the TGT Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and TGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.60
-0.06
COST
TGT

Dividends

COST vs. TGT - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than TGT's 3.41% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.04%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%
TGT
Target Corporation
3.41%3.06%2.66%1.37%1.52%2.03%3.81%3.74%3.21%2.97%2.50%2.50%

Drawdowns

COST vs. TGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum TGT drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and TGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.01%
-46.95%
COST
TGT

Volatility

COST vs. TGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is 4.84%, while Target Corporation (TGT) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that COST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.84%
8.12%
COST
TGT

Financials

COST vs. TGT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Target Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab