COST vs. TGT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Target Corporation (TGT).

Performance

COST vs. TGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Target Corporation (TGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COST vs. TGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	15.71%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	45.70%	10.60%	22.37%
TGT Target Corporation	25.25%	-24.50%	-2.27%	-1.35%	-34.24%	32.91%	40.47%	100.17%	4.67%	-5.84%

Fundamentals

EPS COST : $25.63 TGT : $8.83
PE Ratio COST : 38.87 TGT : 13.72
PS Ratio COST : 1.16 TGT : 0.52
Total Revenue (TTM) COST : $286.27B TGT : $106.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) COST : $19.33B TGT : $29.05B
EBITDA (TTM) COST : $12.73B TGT : $8.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly lower than TGT's 25.25% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed TGT with an annualized return of 22.28%, while TGT has yielded a comparatively lower 7.04% annualized return.

COST

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 6M: 7.95%
• 1Y: 5.93%
• 3Y*: 27.83%
• 5Y*: 24.28%
• 10Y*: 22.28%

TGT

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 6.51%
• YTD: 25.25%
• 6M: 38.21%
• 1Y: 21.46%
• 3Y*: -6.58%
• 5Y*: -6.93%
• 10Y*: 7.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

COST vs. TGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 49
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 44
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 52

TGT

TGT Risk / Return Rank: 62
TGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
TGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TGT Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TGT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST vs. TGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Target Corporation (TGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COST	TGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	0.62	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	1.07	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.13	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	1.10	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	2.34	-1.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COST vs. TGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the TGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and TGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COST	TGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	0.62	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	-0.20	+1.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	0.21	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.34	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between COST and TGT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

COST vs. TGT - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than TGT's 3.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.52%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
TGT Target Corporation	3.75%	4.62%	3.28%	3.06%	2.66%	1.37%	1.52%	2.03%	3.81%	3.74%	3.21%	2.97%

Drawdowns

COST vs. TGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum TGT drawdown of -64.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and TGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	COST	TGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.39%	-64.40%	+11.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.35%	-20.27%	+0.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.40%	-64.40%	+33.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.40%	-64.40%	+33.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.96%	-47.91%	+40.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.40%	-16.96%	+3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.67%	9.55%	+0.12%

Volatility

COST vs. TGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is 4.41%, while Target Corporation (TGT) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that COST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COST	TGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	8.59%	-4.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	21.01%	-7.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.15%	34.54%	-14.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.51%	35.19%	-12.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	33.20%	-11.30%

Financials

COST vs. TGT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Target Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.

TGT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Target Corporation reported a gross profit of 7.89B and revenue of 31.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.7%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

TGT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Target Corporation reported an operating income of 1.87B and revenue of 31.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.

TGT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Target Corporation reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 31.92B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.