PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COST vs. PG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

COST vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
20.34%
5.63%
COST
PG

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 45.62% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 20.82% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 23.82%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.


COST

YTD

45.62%

1M

7.10%

6M

20.34%

1Y

66.89%

5Y (annualized)

28.36%

10Y (annualized)

23.82%

PG

YTD

20.82%

1M

1.80%

6M

5.63%

1Y

17.24%

5Y (annualized)

10.22%

10Y (annualized)

10.03%

Fundamentals


COSTPG
Market Cap$411.21B$402.45B
EPS$16.56$5.81
PE Ratio56.0429.41
PEG Ratio5.633.60
Total Revenue (TTM)$254.45B$83.91B
Gross Profit (TTM)$32.10B$43.14B
EBITDA (TTM)$12.15B$22.14B

Key characteristics


COSTPG
Sharpe Ratio3.481.19
Sortino Ratio4.151.68
Omega Ratio1.611.23
Calmar Ratio6.642.06
Martin Ratio17.186.47
Ulcer Index3.97%2.83%
Daily Std Dev19.62%15.39%
Max Drawdown-53.39%-54.23%
Current Drawdown0.00%-2.26%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between COST and PG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COST vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.481.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 4.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.151.68
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.611.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 6.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.642.06
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 17.18, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0017.186.47
COST
PG

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and PG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.48
1.19
COST
PG

Dividends

COST vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PG's 2.29% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.04%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.29%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.32%2.78%2.91%

Drawdowns

COST vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-2.26%
COST
PG

Volatility

COST vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 5.20%. This indicates that COST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.89%
5.20%
COST
PG

Financials

COST vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items