ADMA vs. AMSC
Compare and contrast key facts about ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC).
Performance
ADMA vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ADMA vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADMA ADMA Biologics, Inc. | -50.60% | 6.36% | 279.42% | 16.49% | 175.18% | -27.69% | -51.25% | 67.36% | -25.55% | -37.30% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 17.62% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
Fundamentals
ADMA:
$2.20B
AMSC:
$1.52B
ADMA:
$0.60
AMSC:
$3.04
ADMA:
15.07
AMSC:
11.15
ADMA:
4.34
AMSC:
5.21
ADMA:
4.60
AMSC:
2.83
ADMA:
$510.17M
AMSC:
$279.40M
ADMA:
$292.77M
AMSC:
$85.47M
ADMA:
$195.35M
AMSC:
$20.09M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADMA achieves a -50.60% return, which is significantly lower than AMSC's 17.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ADMA has underperformed AMSC with an annualized return of 0.68%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.42% annualized return.
ADMA
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -42.13%
- YTD
- -50.60%
- 6M
- -38.54%
- 1Y
- -54.59%
- 3Y*
- 39.63%
- 5Y*
- 37.55%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
AMSC
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 17.62%
- 6M
- -43.00%
- 1Y
- 86.60%
- 3Y*
- 90.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADMA vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
ADMA
AMSC
ADMA vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADMA | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | 1.05 | -2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | 1.69 | -3.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.25 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 1.31 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.86 | 2.40 | -4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADMA | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 1.05 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.14 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 0.20 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | -0.05 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ADMA and AMSC is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ADMA vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ADMA nor AMSC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ADMA vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADMA drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADMA and AMSC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADMA | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -99.57% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.18% | -61.08% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.18% | -82.94% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.33% | -89.06% | +1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.24% | -95.11% | +31.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.91% | -75.66% | +22.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.86% | 33.43% | -3.57% |
Volatility
ADMA vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) has a higher volatility of 31.94% compared to American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) at 22.49%. This indicates that ADMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ADMA | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.94% | 22.49% | +9.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.54% | 69.27% | -24.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.47% | 83.04% | -25.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 88.39% | -28.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.12% | 78.69% | -9.57% |
Financials
ADMA vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADMA Biologics, Inc. and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities