PortfoliosLab logo
ADMA vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ADMA and NVDA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ADMA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ADMA:

1.64

NVDA:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

ADMA:

2.49

NVDA:

0.84

Omega Ratio

ADMA:

1.32

NVDA:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

ADMA:

3.42

NVDA:

0.51

Martin Ratio

ADMA:

6.90

NVDA:

1.24

Ulcer Index

ADMA:

15.74%

NVDA:

15.09%

Daily Std Dev

ADMA:

67.19%

NVDA:

58.96%

Max Drawdown

ADMA:

-91.28%

NVDA:

-89.73%

Current Drawdown

ADMA:

-19.05%

NVDA:

-9.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADMA:

$4.74B

NVDA:

$3.39T

EPS

ADMA:

$0.84

NVDA:

$3.10

PE Ratio

ADMA:

23.62

NVDA:

44.90

PEG Ratio

ADMA:

0.00

NVDA:

1.93

PS Ratio

ADMA:

10.31

NVDA:

22.86

PB Ratio

ADMA:

12.64

NVDA:

41.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADMA:

$459.38M

NVDA:

$148.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADMA:

$241.40M

NVDA:

$104.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADMA:

$158.29M

NVDA:

$90.97B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADMA achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ADMA has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 8.63%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 74.01% annualized return.


ADMA

YTD

15.69%

1M

-16.64%

6M

-1.34%

1Y

109.28%

3Y*

113.11%

5Y*

43.24%

10Y*

8.63%

NVDA

YTD

0.63%

1M

24.06%

6M

-2.24%

1Y

22.32%

3Y*

93.53%

5Y*

72.51%

10Y*

74.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADMA Biologics, Inc.

NVIDIA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ADMA vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ADMA is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ADMA is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ADMA is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NVDA is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NVDA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NVDA is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NVDA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ADMA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ADMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADMA and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ADMA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ADMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%

Drawdowns

ADMA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADMA drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADMA and NVDA.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ADMA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) has a higher volatility of 14.61% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.81%. This indicates that ADMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ADMA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADMA Biologics, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
114.80M
44.06B
(ADMA) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADMA vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ADMA Biologics, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
53.2%
60.5%
(ADMA) Gross Margin
(NVDA) Gross Margin
ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.10M and revenue of 114.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 26.67B and revenue of 44.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.5%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.88M and revenue of 114.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 21.64B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.1%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 26.90M and revenue of 114.80M, resulting in a net margin of 23.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 18.78B and revenue of 44.06B, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.