LFVN vs. EAT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LFVN returned -1.37%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for EAT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LFVN vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 76.52% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed EAT with an annualized return of -1.37%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.68% annualized return.

LFVN

• 1D: 7.32%
• 1M: 101.66%
• YTD: 76.52%
• 6M: 64.50%
• 1Y: -12.25%
• 3Y*: 34.49%
• 5Y*: 8.40%
• 10Y*: -1.37%

EAT

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: -14.86%
• 3Y*: 59.52%
• 5Y*: 18.17%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFVN vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation	76.52%	-64.29%	197.21%	74.03%	-39.78%	-32.19%	-40.29%	18.35%	177.10%	-41.60%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	1.83%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LFVN and EAT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004	0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap LFVN : $135.46M EAT : $6.50B
EPS LFVN : $0.45 EAT : $10.14
PE Ratio LFVN : 23.94 EAT : 14.41
PEG Ratio LFVN : 0.59 EAT : 0.33
PS Ratio LFVN : 0.71 EAT : 1.16
PB Ratio LFVN : 4.06 EAT : 16.02
Total Revenue (TTM) LFVN : $195.32M EAT : $5.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) LFVN : $152.62M EAT : $3.45B
EBITDA (TTM) LFVN : $8.69M EAT : $807.20M

Return for Risk

LFVN vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFVN

LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 37
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 29
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFVN vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFVN	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	-0.32	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	-0.17	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.98	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	-0.34	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.25	-0.69	+0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFVN vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFVN and EAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFVN	EAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	-0.32	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.37	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	0.25	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.28	-0.31

Drawdowns

LFVN vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFVN	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.57%	-88.40%	-11.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.73%	-44.41%	-27.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-83.90%	-45.92%	-37.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.90%	-65.54%	-18.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.90%	-84.94%	+1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.02%	-22.73%	-66.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.58%	-24.34%	-65.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.48%	21.68%	+26.80%

Volatility

LFVN vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 35.26% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 16.59%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFVN	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.26%	16.59%	+18.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.94%	35.50%	+23.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.04%	46.55%	+24.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.91%	48.95%	+15.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.39%	55.09%	+6.30%

Dividends

LFVN vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation	1.73%	2.84%	0.88%	8.33%	2.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

LFVN vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LifeVantage Corporation and Brinker International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LFVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

LFVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

LFVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFVN and EAT in my portfolio?

LFVN and EAT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFVN or EAT?

LFVN has higher volatility (35.26%) compared to EAT (16.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs EAT's -88.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.