PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EAT vs. PLTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and PLTR is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

EAT vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
103.68%
218.91%
EAT
PLTR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EAT:

4.94

PLTR:

5.24

Sortino Ratio

EAT:

4.74

PLTR:

5.01

Omega Ratio

EAT:

1.63

PLTR:

1.67

Calmar Ratio

EAT:

5.08

PLTR:

7.01

Martin Ratio

EAT:

34.21

PLTR:

35.46

Ulcer Index

EAT:

6.44%

PLTR:

9.40%

Daily Std Dev

EAT:

44.69%

PLTR:

63.62%

Max Drawdown

EAT:

-88.40%

PLTR:

-84.62%

Current Drawdown

EAT:

-23.41%

PLTR:

-18.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EAT:

$6.43B

PLTR:

$237.70B

EPS

EAT:

$5.76

PLTR:

$0.19

PE Ratio

EAT:

25.15

PLTR:

533.42

PEG Ratio

EAT:

1.11

PLTR:

3.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

EAT:

$4.83B

PLTR:

$2.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EAT:

$707.00M

PLTR:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

EAT:

$561.50M

PLTR:

$334.98M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's 34.01% return.


EAT

YTD

9.51%

1M

-5.07%

6M

103.67%

1Y

217.63%

5Y*

29.41%

10Y*

10.86%

PLTR

YTD

34.01%

1M

31.85%

6M

218.91%

1Y

329.63%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EAT vs. PLTR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAT is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAT is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAT is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAT is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAT is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAT is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLTR is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLTR is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EAT vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EAT, currently valued at 4.94, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.945.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for EAT, currently valued at 4.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.745.01
The chart of Omega ratio for EAT, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.631.67
The chart of Calmar ratio for EAT, currently valued at 5.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.087.01
The chart of Martin ratio for EAT, currently valued at 34.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0034.2135.46
EAT
PLTR

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.94, which is comparable to the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 5.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and PLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.94
5.24
EAT
PLTR

Dividends

EAT vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither EAT nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%3.62%3.46%3.71%2.67%2.50%1.77%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EAT vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and PLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-23.41%
-18.67%
EAT
PLTR

Volatility

EAT vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is 21.01%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 29.59%. This indicates that EAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
21.01%
29.59%
EAT
PLTR

Financials

EAT vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab