LFVN vs. ELMD
LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and ELMD (Electromed, Inc.) are both stocks. LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while ELMD operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LFVN returned -2.84%/yr vs 23.39%/yr for ELMD. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFVN vs. ELMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 42.21% return, which is significantly higher than ELMD's 25.62% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed ELMD with an annualized return of -2.84%, while ELMD has yielded a comparatively higher 23.39% annualized return.
LFVN
- 1D
- -8.59%
- 1M
- 59.76%
- YTD
- 42.21%
- 6M
- 35.18%
- 1Y
- -28.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- -2.84%
ELMD
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 42.89%
- YTD
- 25.62%
- 6M
- 34.34%
- 1Y
- 78.79%
- 3Y*
- 45.77%
- 5Y*
- 27.63%
- 10Y*
- 23.39%
LFVN vs. ELMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 42.21% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
ELMD Electromed, Inc. | 25.62% | -1.46% | 170.85% | 4.00% | -19.31% | 32.52% | 13.41% | 69.94% | -16.14% | 56.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFVN and ELMD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
LFVN:
$109.13M
ELMD:
$316.34M
LFVN:
$0.45
ELMD:
$1.16
LFVN:
19.29
ELMD:
31.44
LFVN:
0.47
ELMD:
0.86
LFVN:
0.57
ELMD:
4.43
LFVN:
3.27
ELMD:
6.43
LFVN:
$195.32M
ELMD:
$71.75M
LFVN:
$152.62M
ELMD:
$56.28M
LFVN:
$8.69M
ELMD:
$14.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFVN vs. ELMD — Risk / Return Rank
LFVN
ELMD
LFVN vs. ELMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFVN | ELMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | 1.50 | -1.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | 2.37 | -2.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.31 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 3.49 | -3.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 7.08 | -7.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFVN | ELMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 1.50 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.60 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.44 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.22 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
LFVN vs. ELMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than ELMD's maximum drawdown of -78.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and ELMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFVN | ELMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -78.65% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.73% | -23.27% | -48.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.90% | -48.86% | -35.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -48.86% | -35.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | -55.84% | -28.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.16% | -6.90% | -84.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.58% | -33.81% | -55.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.30% | 11.46% | +36.84% |
Volatility
LFVN vs. ELMD - Volatility Comparison
LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 40.94% compared to Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) at 25.82%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFVN | ELMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.94% | 25.82% | +15.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.41% | 37.26% | +20.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.34% | 52.71% | +16.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.54% | 46.34% | +18.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.20% | 53.01% | +8.19% |
Dividends
LFVN vs. ELMD - Dividend Comparison
LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while ELMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELMD Electromed, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.15% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
Financials
LFVN vs. ELMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and Electromed, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFVN vs. ELMD - Profitability Comparison
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
ELMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 18.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
ELMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.77M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
ELMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFVN and ELMD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (40.94%) compared to ELMD (25.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs ELMD's -78.65%.
ELMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFVN and ELMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer