PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFVN vs. HAIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LFVN vs. HAIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 42.21% return, which is significantly higher than HAIN's -24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has outperformed HAIN with an annualized return of -2.84%, while HAIN has yielded a comparatively lower -33.71% annualized return.


LFVN

1D
-8.59%
1M
59.76%
YTD
42.21%
6M
35.18%
1Y
-28.91%
3Y*
26.80%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
-2.84%

HAIN

1D
-1.79%
1M
19.73%
YTD
-24.07%
6M
-24.07%
1Y
-54.87%
3Y*
-59.38%
5Y*
-54.25%
10Y*
-33.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFVN vs. HAIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
42.21%-64.29%197.21%74.03%-39.78%-32.19%-40.29%18.35%177.10%-41.60%
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
-24.07%-82.60%-43.84%-32.32%-62.03%6.13%54.69%63.65%-62.59%8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LFVN and HAIN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.09

The correlation between LFVN and HAIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LFVN:

$109.13M

HAIN:

$73.92M

EPS

LFVN:

$0.45

HAIN:

-$5.71

PS Ratio

LFVN:

0.57

HAIN:

0.05

PB Ratio

LFVN:

3.27

HAIN:

0.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFVN:

$195.32M

HAIN:

$1.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFVN:

$152.62M

HAIN:

$287.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

LFVN:

$8.69M

HAIN:

-$304.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFVN vs. HAIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFVN
LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

HAIN
HAIN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
HAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFVN vs. HAIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFVNHAINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.42

-0.65

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.23

-0.70

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.91

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

-0.77

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

-1.25

+0.58

LFVN vs. HAIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is higher than the HAIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFVN and HAIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFVNHAINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

-0.65

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

-0.87

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

-0.66

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

-0.04

0.00

Drawdowns

LFVN vs. HAIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum HAIN drawdown of -99.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and HAIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFVNHAINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-99.17%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.73%

-73.02%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.90%

-95.60%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.90%

-98.79%

+14.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

-98.95%

+15.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.16%

-98.84%

+7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.58%

-41.06%

-48.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.30%

45.22%

+3.08%

Volatility

LFVN vs. HAIN - Volatility Comparison

LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 40.94% compared to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) at 26.60%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFVNHAINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.94%

26.60%

+14.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.41%

66.90%

-9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.34%

84.94%

-15.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.54%

62.47%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.20%

51.03%

+10.17%

Dividends

LFVN vs. HAIN - Dividend Comparison

LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while HAIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
2.15%2.84%0.88%8.33%2.42%

Financials

LFVN vs. HAIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
43.72M
338.36M
(LFVN) Total Revenue
(HAIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LFVN vs. HAIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LifeVantage Corporation and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
20.8%
Portfolio components
LFVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

HAIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 70.39M and revenue of 338.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

LFVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

HAIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.31M and revenue of 338.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

LFVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

HAIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported a net income of -106.34M and revenue of 338.36M, resulting in a net margin of -31.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFVN and HAIN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFVN has higher volatility (40.94%) compared to HAIN (26.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs HAIN's -99.17%.

LFVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFVN and HAIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer