PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFVN vs. AGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LFVN vs. AGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Argan, Inc. (AGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than AGX's 135.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed AGX with an annualized return of -5.92%, while AGX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.51% annualized return.


LFVN

1D
1.64%
1M
10.86%
YTD
1.95%
6M
0.81%
1Y
-47.43%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
-5.92%

AGX

1D
-6.74%
1M
12.25%
YTD
135.64%
6M
121.56%
1Y
255.33%
3Y*
170.89%
5Y*
75.91%
10Y*
37.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFVN vs. AGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
1.95%-64.29%197.21%74.03%-39.78%-32.19%-40.29%18.35%177.10%-41.60%
AGX
Argan, Inc.
135.64%130.61%198.31%30.24%-2.01%-11.64%19.15%8.62%-14.32%-34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LFVN and AGX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004

0.07

The correlation between LFVN and AGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LFVN:

$78.24M

AGX:

$10.46B

EPS

LFVN:

$0.45

AGX:

$11.38

PE Ratio

LFVN:

13.83

AGX:

64.71

PEG Ratio

LFVN:

0.34

AGX:

1.18

PS Ratio

LFVN:

0.41

AGX:

10.02

PB Ratio

LFVN:

2.35

AGX:

22.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFVN:

$195.32M

AGX:

$1.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFVN:

$152.62M

AGX:

$217.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

LFVN:

$8.69M

AGX:

$163.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFVN vs. AGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFVN
LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AGX
AGX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFVN vs. AGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Argan, Inc. (AGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFVNAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.47

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

10.30

-10.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

29.33

-30.29

LFVN vs. AGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the AGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFVN and AGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFVN vs. AGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than AGX's maximum drawdown of -94.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and AGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFVNAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-94.37%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.73%

-24.96%

-46.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.90%

-43.75%

-40.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.90%

-43.75%

-40.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

-54.61%

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.66%

-6.74%

-86.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.57%

-48.30%

-41.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.42%

8.75%

+40.67%

Volatility

LFVN vs. AGX - Volatility Comparison

LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 52.96% compared to Argan, Inc. (AGX) at 20.17%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFVNAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

52.96%

20.17%

+32.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.93%

54.86%

+14.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.54%

74.89%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.39%

51.29%

+15.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.13%

46.04%

+16.09%

Dividends

LFVN vs. AGX - Dividend Comparison

LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than AGX's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGX
Argan, Inc.
0.25%0.52%0.93%2.24%2.71%1.94%7.31%2.49%1.98%4.44%1.42%2.16%
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
2.99%2.84%0.88%8.33%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LFVN vs. AGX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and Argan, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
43.72M
290.95M
(LFVN) Total Revenue
(AGX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LFVN vs. AGX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LifeVantage Corporation and Argan, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
21.0%
Portfolio components
LFVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

AGX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Argan, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.11M and revenue of 290.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

LFVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

AGX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Argan, Inc. reported an operating income of 45.40M and revenue of 290.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

LFVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

AGX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Argan, Inc. reported a net income of 46.06M and revenue of 290.95M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFVN and AGX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFVN has higher volatility (52.96%) compared to AGX (20.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs AGX's -94.37%.

AGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFVN and AGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer