EAT vs. SFM

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than SFM's 12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed SFM with an annualized return of 10.86%, while SFM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.65% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.94, which is comparable to the SFM Sharpe Ratio of 4.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and SFM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither EAT nor SFM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than SFM's maximum drawdown of -72.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and SFM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 21.01% compared to Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) at 19.77%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.