PortfoliosLab logo
EAT vs. CAVA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EAT and CAVA is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EAT vs. CAVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
274.66%
119.14%
EAT
CAVA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EAT:

2.64

CAVA:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

EAT:

2.88

CAVA:

1.07

Omega Ratio

EAT:

1.40

CAVA:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

EAT:

4.30

CAVA:

0.57

Martin Ratio

EAT:

11.31

CAVA:

1.34

Ulcer Index

EAT:

12.15%

CAVA:

21.69%

Daily Std Dev

EAT:

52.14%

CAVA:

57.88%

Max Drawdown

EAT:

-88.40%

CAVA:

-50.91%

Current Drawdown

EAT:

-27.76%

CAVA:

-36.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EAT:

$5.92B

CAVA:

$11.18B

EPS

EAT:

$7.19

CAVA:

$1.10

PE Ratio

EAT:

18.51

CAVA:

87.86

PS Ratio

EAT:

1.11

CAVA:

11.50

PB Ratio

EAT:

22.84

CAVA:

15.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

EAT:

$5.13B

CAVA:

$704.71M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EAT:

$1.65B

CAVA:

$236.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

EAT:

$660.50M

CAVA:

$89.46M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than CAVA's -14.95% return.


EAT

YTD

3.29%

1M

2.81%

6M

23.43%

1Y

136.07%

5Y*

43.72%

10Y*

11.50%

CAVA

YTD

-14.95%

1M

22.28%

6M

-32.14%

1Y

29.37%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EAT vs. CAVA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAT is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAT is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAT is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAT is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAT is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAT is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CAVA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAVA is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAVA is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAVA is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAVA is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAVA is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAVA is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EAT vs. CAVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the CAVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and CAVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.64
0.51
EAT
CAVA

Dividends

EAT vs. CAVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither EAT nor CAVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%3.62%3.46%3.71%2.67%2.50%1.77%
CAVA
CAVA Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EAT vs. CAVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than CAVA's maximum drawdown of -50.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and CAVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-27.76%
-36.41%
EAT
CAVA

Volatility

EAT vs. CAVA - Volatility Comparison

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 22.13% compared to CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) at 20.56%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
22.13%
20.56%
EAT
CAVA

Financials

EAT vs. CAVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and CAVA Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
1.43B
227.40M
(EAT) Total Revenue
(CAVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EAT vs. CAVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brinker International, Inc. and CAVA Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
75.2%
22.6%
(EAT) Gross Margin
(CAVA) Gross Margin
EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.07B and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.2%.

CAVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CAVA Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.43M and revenue of 227.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.6%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 156.90M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

CAVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CAVA Group Inc. reported an operating income of 3.95M and revenue of 227.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.7%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 119.10M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.

CAVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CAVA Group Inc. reported a net income of 78.62M and revenue of 227.40M, resulting in a net margin of 34.6%.