EAT vs. CAVA
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and CAVA (CAVA Group Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past year, EAT returned -19.09% vs -12.00% for CAVA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. CAVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than CAVA's 21.54% return.
EAT
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- -19.09%
- 3Y*
- 52.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
CAVA
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 30.90%
- 1Y
- -12.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAT vs. CAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | -2.27% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 18.40% |
CAVA CAVA Group Inc. | 21.54% | -47.97% | 162.45% | -1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and CAVA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
EAT:
$10.14
CAVA:
$0.54
EAT:
13.83
CAVA:
132.28
EAT:
0.32
CAVA:
0.72
EAT:
1.12
CAVA:
7.15
EAT:
$5.73B
CAVA:
$1.18B
EAT:
$3.45B
CAVA:
$216.81M
EAT:
$807.20M
CAVA:
$150.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. CAVA — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
CAVA
EAT vs. CAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAT | CAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.23 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | -0.46 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAT | CAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | -0.21 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.30 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
EAT vs. CAVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than CAVA's maximum drawdown of -71.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and CAVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | CAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -71.11% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -52.65% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.84% | -52.72% | +26.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -29.99% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.52% | 26.20% | -4.68% |
Volatility
EAT vs. CAVA - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and CAVA Group Inc. (CAVA) have volatilities of 16.02% and 15.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | CAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.02% | 15.29% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.41% | 41.52% | -6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.21% | 57.28% | -11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.06% | 59.24% | -10.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.07% | 59.24% | -4.17% |
Dividends
EAT vs. CAVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither EAT nor CAVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAVA CAVA Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
Financials
EAT vs. CAVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and CAVA Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. CAVA - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
CAVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAVA Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 40.95M and revenue of 274.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.9%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
CAVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAVA Group Inc. reported an operating income of 8.43M and revenue of 274.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
CAVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CAVA Group Inc. reported a net income of 4.92M and revenue of 274.99M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and CAVA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (16.02%) compared to CAVA (15.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAT dropped -88.40% vs CAVA's -71.11%.
CAVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAT and CAVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer