PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFVN vs. TRGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LFVN vs. TRGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LFVN having a 42.21% return and TRGP slightly higher at 44.14%. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed TRGP with an annualized return of -2.84%, while TRGP has yielded a comparatively higher 24.99% annualized return.


LFVN

1D
-8.59%
1M
59.76%
YTD
42.21%
6M
35.18%
1Y
-28.91%
3Y*
26.80%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
-2.84%

TRGP

1D
1.63%
1M
3.55%
YTD
44.14%
6M
54.80%
1Y
65.89%
3Y*
57.89%
5Y*
47.94%
10Y*
24.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFVN vs. TRGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
42.21%-64.29%197.21%74.03%-39.78%-32.19%-40.29%18.35%177.10%-41.60%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
44.14%5.65%110.12%21.01%43.71%100.15%-32.48%23.98%-19.88%-7.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LFVN and TRGP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.11

The correlation between LFVN and TRGP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LFVN:

$0.45

TRGP:

$13.11

PE Ratio

LFVN:

19.29

TRGP:

20.08

PEG Ratio

LFVN:

0.47

TRGP:

0.22

PS Ratio

LFVN:

0.57

TRGP:

2.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFVN:

$195.32M

TRGP:

$16.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFVN:

$152.62M

TRGP:

$3.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

LFVN:

$8.69M

TRGP:

$4.49B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFVN vs. TRGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFVN
LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TRGP
TRGP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TRGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRGP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TRGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRGP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFVN vs. TRGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFVNTRGPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.42

2.40

-2.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.23

2.97

-3.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.37

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

4.33

-4.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

14.22

-14.89

LFVN vs. TRGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the TRGP Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFVN and TRGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFVNTRGPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

2.40

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.49

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.53

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.47

-0.51

Drawdowns

LFVN vs. TRGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum TRGP drawdown of -95.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and TRGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFVNTRGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-95.21%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.73%

-16.30%

-55.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.90%

-31.61%

-52.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.90%

-31.61%

-52.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

-90.78%

+6.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.16%

-4.86%

-86.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.58%

-33.62%

-55.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.30%

4.96%

+43.34%

Volatility

LFVN vs. TRGP - Volatility Comparison

LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 40.94% compared to Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) at 9.09%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFVNTRGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.94%

9.09%

+31.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.41%

18.83%

+38.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.34%

27.70%

+41.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.54%

32.42%

+32.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.20%

47.69%

+13.51%

Dividends

LFVN vs. TRGP - Dividend Comparison

LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than TRGP's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
2.15%2.84%0.88%8.33%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
1.61%2.03%1.54%2.13%1.90%0.77%4.59%8.92%10.11%7.52%6.49%12.53%

Financials

LFVN vs. TRGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and Targa Resources Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
43.72M
4.09B
(LFVN) Total Revenue
(TRGP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LFVN vs. TRGP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LifeVantage Corporation and Targa Resources Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
0
Portfolio components
LFVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

TRGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LFVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

TRGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported an operating income of 846.90M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.

LFVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

TRGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a net income of 479.60M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFVN and TRGP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFVN has higher volatility (40.94%) compared to TRGP (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs TRGP's -95.21%.

TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFVN and TRGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer