LFVN vs. WMT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — LFVN in Packaged Foods, WMT in Discount Stores. Over the past 10 years, LFVN returned -2.84%/yr vs 18.97%/yr for WMT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LFVN vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 42.21% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of -2.84%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.97% annualized return.

LFVN

• 1D: -8.59%
• 1M: 59.76%
• YTD: 42.21%
• 6M: 35.18%
• 1Y: -28.91%
• 3Y*: 26.80%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: -2.84%

WMT

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -13.92%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 14.27%
• 3Y*: 33.04%
• 5Y*: 20.62%
• 10Y*: 18.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFVN vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation	42.21%	-64.29%	197.21%	74.03%	-39.78%	-32.19%	-40.29%	18.35%	177.10%	-41.60%
WMT Walmart Inc.	1.88%	24.49%	73.99%	12.88%	-0.46%	1.97%	23.32%	30.16%	-3.43%	46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between LFVN and WMT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004	0.07

The correlation between LFVN and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LFVN : $109.13M WMT : $904.37B
EPS LFVN : $0.45 WMT : $2.88
PE Ratio LFVN : 19.29 WMT : 39.27
PEG Ratio LFVN : 0.47 WMT : 2.56
PS Ratio LFVN : 0.57 WMT : 1.25
PB Ratio LFVN : 3.27 WMT : 9.59
Total Revenue (TTM) LFVN : $195.32M WMT : $725.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) LFVN : $152.62M WMT : $181.16B
EBITDA (TTM) LFVN : $8.69M WMT : $44.32B

Return for Risk

LFVN vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFVN

LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 25
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 25
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 28

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 59
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFVN vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFVN	WMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	0.61	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.23	1.02	-1.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.13	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	0.98	-1.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	3.32	-3.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFVN vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFVN and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFVN	WMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	0.61	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.96	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	0.88	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.63	-0.67

Drawdowns

LFVN vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and WMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFVN	WMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.57%	-77.14%	-22.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.73%	-15.75%	-55.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-83.90%	-21.93%	-61.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.90%	-25.74%	-58.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.90%	-25.74%	-58.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.16%	-15.75%	-75.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.58%	-14.63%	-74.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.30%	4.67%	+43.63%

Volatility

LFVN vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 40.94% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 9.21%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFVN	WMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.94%	9.21%	+31.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.41%	18.36%	+39.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.34%	23.49%	+45.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.54%	21.63%	+42.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.20%	21.70%	+39.50%

Dividends

LFVN vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than WMT's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation	2.15%	2.84%	0.88%	8.33%	2.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.85%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%

Financials

LFVN vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LifeVantage Corporation and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LFVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

LFVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

LFVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFVN and WMT in my portfolio?

LFVN and WMT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFVN or WMT?

LFVN has higher volatility (40.94%) compared to WMT (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs WMT's -77.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.