LFVN vs. WMT
LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — LFVN in Packaged Foods, WMT in Discount Stores. Over the past 10 years, LFVN returned -6.04%/yr vs 18.40%/yr for WMT. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LFVN vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of -6.04%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.40% annualized return.
LFVN
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- 6M
- 23.29%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -47.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- -1.69%
- 10Y*
- -6.04%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.09%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 29.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- 18.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $425.33K | $761.41K | $3.47M | |
WMT Walmart Inc. | $2.47B | $2.41B | $2.70B |
LFVN vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 6.08% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.21% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFVN and WMT is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004 | 0.07 |
The correlation between LFVN and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFVN:
$81.12M
WMT:
$884.94B
LFVN:
$0.45
WMT:
$2.88
LFVN:
14.29
WMT:
38.61
LFVN:
0.35
WMT:
2.52
LFVN:
0.42
WMT:
1.23
LFVN:
2.44
WMT:
9.43
LFVN:
$195.32M
WMT:
$725.31B
LFVN:
$152.62M
WMT:
$181.16B
LFVN:
$8.69M
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFVN vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
LFVN
WMT
LFVN vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFVN | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.12 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 0.75 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 1.96 | -2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFVN vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFVN | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -77.14% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.73% | -19.23% | -52.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.90% | -21.93% | -61.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -25.74% | -58.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | -25.74% | -58.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.40% | -17.14% | -76.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.59% | -14.63% | -74.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.57% | 7.39% | +45.18% |
Volatility
LFVN vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) have volatilities of 6.56% and 6.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFVN | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 6.81% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.20% | 19.61% | +47.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.44% | 24.77% | +51.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.86% | 21.96% | +43.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.85% | 21.90% | +39.95% |
Dividends
LFVN vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than WMT's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.88% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.87% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
LFVN vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFVN vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
WMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
WMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
WMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFVN and WMT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to LFVN (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs WMT's -77.14%.
WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFVN and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer