EAT vs. CMG

In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -14.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed CMG with an annualized return of 10.86%, while CMG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.49% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.94, which is higher than the CMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAT and CMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither EAT nor CMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and CMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 21.01% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) at 9.13%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.