EAT vs. CMG
Compare and contrast key facts about Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EAT or CMG.
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and CMG is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EAT vs. CMG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EAT:
2.64
CMG:
-0.57
EAT:
2.88
CMG:
-0.65
EAT:
1.40
CMG:
0.92
EAT:
4.30
CMG:
-0.59
EAT:
11.31
CMG:
-1.08
EAT:
12.15%
CMG:
18.22%
EAT:
52.14%
CMG:
33.94%
EAT:
-88.40%
CMG:
-74.61%
EAT:
-27.76%
CMG:
-24.95%
Fundamentals
EAT:
$5.92B
CMG:
$67.38B
EAT:
$7.19
CMG:
$1.13
EAT:
18.51
CMG:
44.26
EAT:
1.11
CMG:
2.22
EAT:
1.11
CMG:
6.05
EAT:
22.84
CMG:
19.90
EAT:
$5.13B
CMG:
$11.49B
EAT:
$1.65B
CMG:
$4.28B
EAT:
$660.50M
CMG:
$2.37B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -14.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EAT has underperformed CMG with an annualized return of 11.50%, while CMG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.
EAT
3.29%
2.81%
23.43%
136.07%
43.72%
11.50%
CMG
-14.68%
11.90%
-11.61%
-19.19%
22.76%
15.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EAT vs. CMG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EAT
CMG
EAT vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EAT vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither EAT nor CMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.77% |
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EAT vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than CMG's maximum drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and CMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EAT vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 22.13% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) at 13.70%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EAT vs. CMG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. CMG - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.07B and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.2%.
CMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.01B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.8%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 156.90M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
CMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 479.25M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 119.10M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.
CMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 386.60M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.