JHMD vs. IDHQ
JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - JHMD tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index while IDHQ tracks the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 9.54%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for IDHQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.
Performance
JHMD vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than IDHQ's 25.17% return.
JHMD
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- —
IDHQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- YTD
- 25.17%
- 1Y
- 36.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
JHMD vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 10.34% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -14.54% | 25.02% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 25.17% | 27.46% | 1.33% | 18.80% | -20.23% | 11.38% | 16.09% | 29.58% | -13.38% | 28.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMD and IDHQ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JHMD and IDHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMD vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank
JHMD
IDHQ
JHMD vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHMD | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.76 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 10.86 | -3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHMD vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and IDHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMD | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -73.84% | +38.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -13.44% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -14.07% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -33.54% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -1.62% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -21.08% | +14.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.41% | -0.34% |
Volatility
JHMD vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 3.73%, while Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMD | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 6.07% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 18.90% | -5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 20.75% | -5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.84% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 17.96% | -0.78% |
JHMD vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMD vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison
JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than IDHQ's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 2.02% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMD and IDHQ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDHQ has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to JHMD (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.
On 5-year performance, IDHQ leads with 9.70% vs 9.54% for JHMD. On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 9.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.
JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 2.02% for IDHQ.
JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.29% for IDHQ.
IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMD and IDHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer