IDHQ vs. VEA
IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDHQ returned 10.76%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IDHQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
IDHQ vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDHQ achieves a 27.25% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IDHQ has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 10.76%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.
IDHQ
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 18.33%
- YTD
- 27.25%
- 1Y
- 42.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.36%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 30.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.00M | $6.33M | $5.63M | |
| $651.74M | $763.09M | $794.89M |
IDHQ vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 27.25% | 27.46% | 1.33% | 18.80% | -20.23% | 11.38% | 16.09% | 29.58% | -13.38% | 28.16% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.51% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDHQ and VEA is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IDHQ and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDHQ vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
IDHQ
VEA
IDHQ vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDHQ | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.63 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 9.84 | +2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDHQ vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDHQ drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDHQ and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDHQ | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.84% | -60.68% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -11.63% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -13.45% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.54% | -29.71% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.54% | -35.73% | +2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -1.86% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.03% | -13.20% | -7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.11% | +0.24% |
Volatility
IDHQ vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) is 4.02%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that IDHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDHQ | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 5.40% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.89% | 15.35% | +3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 17.26% | +3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 16.85% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 17.22% | +0.76% |
IDHQ vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDHQ vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
IDHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than VEA's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 1.99% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.55% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IDHQ and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to IDHQ (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDHQ dropped -73.84% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, IDHQ leads with 10.76% vs 10.06% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IDHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for IDHQ.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.99% for IDHQ.
IDHQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for IDHQ and 0.03% for VEA.
IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDHQ and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer