PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IDHQ vs. INTF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IDHQ and INTF is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

IDHQ vs. INTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
78.78%
62.48%
IDHQ
INTF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IDHQ:

0.18

INTF:

0.48

Sortino Ratio

IDHQ:

0.38

INTF:

0.80

Omega Ratio

IDHQ:

1.05

INTF:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

IDHQ:

0.23

INTF:

0.62

Martin Ratio

IDHQ:

0.59

INTF:

1.95

Ulcer Index

IDHQ:

5.42%

INTF:

4.36%

Daily Std Dev

IDHQ:

17.30%

INTF:

17.65%

Max Drawdown

IDHQ:

-73.84%

INTF:

-40.39%

Current Drawdown

IDHQ:

-6.50%

INTF:

-5.04%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IDHQ having a 5.54% return and INTF slightly higher at 5.68%.


IDHQ

YTD

5.54%

1M

-5.11%

6M

-2.98%

1Y

3.25%

5Y*

8.40%

10Y*

6.17%

INTF

YTD

5.68%

1M

-4.53%

6M

0.66%

1Y

9.89%

5Y*

11.05%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDHQ vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than INTF's 0.30% expense ratio.


INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
Expense ratio chart for INTF: current value is 0.30%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
INTF: 0.30%
Expense ratio chart for IDHQ: current value is 0.29%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IDHQ: 0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IDHQ vs. INTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDHQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IDHQ is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IDHQ is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IDHQ is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IDHQ is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IDHQ is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IDHQ is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

INTF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INTF is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INTF is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INTF is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INTF is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INTF is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INTF is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IDHQ vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IDHQ, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
IDHQ: 0.18
INTF: 0.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for IDHQ, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
IDHQ: 0.38
INTF: 0.80
The chart of Omega ratio for IDHQ, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
IDHQ: 1.05
INTF: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for IDHQ, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
IDHQ: 0.23
INTF: 0.62
The chart of Martin ratio for IDHQ, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
IDHQ: 0.59
INTF: 1.95

The current IDHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the INTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDHQ and INTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.18
0.48
IDHQ
INTF

Dividends

IDHQ vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison

IDHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than INTF's 3.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IDHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF
2.44%2.41%2.52%3.32%2.10%1.60%2.10%2.67%1.68%2.36%1.71%1.75%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
3.34%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.25%1.66%0.85%0.00%

Drawdowns

IDHQ vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDHQ drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than INTF's maximum drawdown of -40.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDHQ and INTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-6.50%
-5.04%
IDHQ
INTF

Volatility

IDHQ vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) is 10.83%, while iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that IDHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
10.83%
11.84%
IDHQ
INTF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab