IDHQ vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IDHQ tracks the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index while FNDF tracks the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDHQ returned 9.97%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for FNDF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDHQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDHQ achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 22.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IDHQ has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.97%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.01% annualized return.

IDHQ

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 7.32%
• YTD: 19.28%
• 6M: 22.10%
• 1Y: 30.57%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.57%
• YTD: 22.03%
• 6M: 26.38%
• 1Y: 44.73%
• 3Y*: 24.37%
• 5Y*: 13.68%
• 10Y*: 12.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF	19.28%	27.46%	1.33%	18.80%	-20.23%	11.38%	16.09%	29.58%	-13.38%	28.16%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	22.03%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IDHQ and FNDF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.79

The correlation between IDHQ and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IDHQ vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDHQ

IDHQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
IDHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IDHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IDHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
IDHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
IDHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDHQ	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.99	-1.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	3.89	-1.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.53	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	4.38	-2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.52	16.77	-7.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDHQ and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDHQ	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.99	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.85	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.68	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.54	-0.33

Drawdowns

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDHQ drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDHQ and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDHQ	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.84%	-40.14%	-33.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.44%	-10.60%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.07%	-13.89%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.54%	-25.56%	-7.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.54%	-40.14%	+6.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	0.00%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.20%	-7.65%	-13.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	2.77%	+0.60%

Volatility

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) at 5.34%. This indicates that IDHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDHQ	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.59%	5.34%	+2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.38%	12.51%	+3.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	15.07%	+3.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	16.18%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.93%	17.67%	+0.26%

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDHQ vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

IDHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than FNDF's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	2.82%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF	2.02%	2.46%	2.41%	2.52%	3.33%	2.10%	1.60%	2.10%	2.67%	1.68%	2.36%	1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDHQ and FNDF in my portfolio?

IDHQ and FNDF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDHQ or FNDF?

IDHQ has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to FNDF (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDHQ dropped -73.84% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, IDHQ or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.01% vs 9.97% for IDHQ. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDHQ or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.01% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDHQ or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for IDHQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDHQ or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 2.02% for IDHQ.

What is the main difference between IDHQ and FNDF?

IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index, while FNDF tracks Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for IDHQ and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.