PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVOV having a 10.60% return and IMCV slightly higher at 11.06%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOV having a 10.85% annualized return and IMCV not far behind at 10.80%.


IVOV

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.93%
YTD
10.60%
6M
8.95%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
10.85%

IMCV

1D
0.58%
1M
1.64%
YTD
11.06%
6M
10.33%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
10.60%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
11.06%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and IMCV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.89

The correlation between IVOV and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOV vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
IMCV

Financial Services

21.0%
15.2%

Industrials

18.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
9.1%

Technology

10.1%
10.3%

Real Estate

9.5%
5.5%

Basic Materials

6.8%
6.4%

Energy

6.8%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.0%

Utilities

4.0%
9.6%

Healthcare

3.8%
8.7%

Communication Services

0.5%
2.5%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.0%
IMCV
15.2%

Industrials

IVOV
18.5%
IMCV
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.9%
IMCV
9.1%

Technology

IVOV
10.1%
IMCV
10.3%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.5%
IMCV
5.5%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.8%
IMCV
6.4%

Energy

IVOV
6.8%
IMCV
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
4.9%
IMCV
9.0%

Utilities

IVOV
4.0%
IMCV
9.6%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.8%
IMCV
8.7%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
IMCV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.39

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

12.59

-5.85

IVOV vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-64.74%

+18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-6.90%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-18.63%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-19.87%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-46.33%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.88%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-8.40%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.86%

+1.21%

Volatility

IVOV vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) at 3.11%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.11%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

8.12%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

11.75%

+3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

16.62%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.70%

19.61%

+2.09%

IVOV vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than IMCV's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.91%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.65%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IVOV and IMCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOV has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to IMCV (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.85% vs 10.80% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.65% for IVOV.

IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer