IVOV vs. VOE
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Vanguard - IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while VOE tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOV returned 10.85%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for VOE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOE.
Performance
IVOV vs. VOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 11.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOV having a 10.85% annualized return and VOE not far ahead at 10.96%.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
VOE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 23.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
IVOV vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 10.60% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 11.74% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and VOE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IVOV and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
VOE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
VOE
Industrials
IVOV
VOE
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
VOE
Technology
IVOV
VOE
Real Estate
IVOV
VOE
Basic Materials
IVOV
VOE
Energy
IVOV
VOE
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
VOE
Utilities
IVOV
VOE
Healthcare
IVOV
VOE
Communication Services
IVOV
VOE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
VOE
IVOV vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOV | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 3.35 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.74 | 12.65 | -5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -61.50% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -6.93% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -18.45% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -19.70% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -43.18% | -2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -1.07% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -8.33% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 1.83% | +1.24% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 3.36%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 3.36% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 8.36% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.64% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 16.01% | +3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 18.79% | +2.91% |
IVOV vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than VOE's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IVOV and VOE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVOV has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to VOE (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VOE's -61.50%.
On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.96% vs 10.85% for IVOV. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.
VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.65% for IVOV.
IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.05% for VOE.
VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and VOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer