IVOV vs. VO
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOV returned 10.90%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
IVOV vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVOV having a 11.06% return and VO slightly higher at 11.30%. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.90%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.
IVOV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 22.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
VO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
IVOV vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 11.06% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 11.30% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and VO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IVOV and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
VO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
VO
Industrials
IVOV
VO
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
VO
Technology
IVOV
VO
Real Estate
IVOV
VO
Basic Materials
IVOV
VO
Energy
IVOV
VO
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
VO
Utilities
IVOV
VO
Healthcare
IVOV
VO
Communication Services
IVOV
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
VO
IVOV vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.45 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 9.23 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -58.87% | +12.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -8.17% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -19.02% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -27.57% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -39.37% | -6.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.45% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -7.85% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.16% | +0.90% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 3.71%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 4.35% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 9.80% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 12.80% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 17.66% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 18.98% | +2.76% |
IVOV vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VO's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOV and VO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VO has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IVOV (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 12.03% vs 10.90% for IVOV. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.35% for VO.
IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.03% for VO.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer