PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVOV having a 11.06% return and VO slightly higher at 11.30%. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.90%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.


IVOV

1D
0.18%
1M
3.35%
YTD
11.06%
6M
9.05%
1Y
22.35%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
10.90%

VO

1D
0.44%
1M
3.04%
YTD
11.30%
6M
9.77%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
11.06%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
11.30%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and VO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.86

The correlation between IVOV and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOV vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
VO

Financial Services

21.0%
12.5%

Industrials

18.5%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
8.6%

Technology

10.1%
20.8%

Real Estate

9.5%
5.1%

Basic Materials

6.8%
4.0%

Energy

6.8%
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Utilities

4.0%
7.9%

Healthcare

3.8%
7.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.0%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.0%
VO
12.5%

Industrials

IVOV
18.5%
VO
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.9%
VO
8.6%

Technology

IVOV
10.1%
VO
20.8%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.5%
VO
5.1%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.8%
VO
4.0%

Energy

IVOV
6.8%
VO
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
4.9%
VO
4.7%

Utilities

IVOV
4.0%
VO
7.9%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.8%
VO
7.5%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
VO
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.45

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

9.23

-1.92

IVOV vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-58.87%

+12.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-8.17%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-19.02%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-27.57%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-39.37%

-6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.45%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-7.85%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.16%

+0.90%

Volatility

IVOV vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 3.71%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

4.35%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

9.80%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

12.80%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.66%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

18.98%

+2.76%

IVOV vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.64%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.35%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and VO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IVOV (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 12.03% vs 10.90% for IVOV. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.35% for VO.

IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.03% for VO.

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer