PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. MDYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. MDYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVOV having a 11.06% return and MDYV slightly higher at 11.09%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOV having a 10.90% annualized return and MDYV not far behind at 10.84%.


IVOV

1D
0.18%
1M
3.35%
YTD
11.06%
6M
9.05%
1Y
22.35%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
10.90%

MDYV

1D
0.15%
1M
3.27%
YTD
11.09%
6M
9.04%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. MDYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
11.06%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
11.09%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and MDYV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.93

The correlation between IVOV and MDYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOV vs. MDYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
MDYV

Financial Services

21.0%
21.4%

Industrials

18.5%
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
13.9%

Technology

10.1%
10.2%

Real Estate

9.5%
9.6%

Basic Materials

6.8%
6.3%

Energy

6.8%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Utilities

4.0%
4.0%

Healthcare

3.8%
3.8%

Communication Services

0.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.0%
MDYV
21.4%

Industrials

IVOV
18.5%
MDYV
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.9%
MDYV
13.9%

Technology

IVOV
10.1%
MDYV
10.2%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.5%
MDYV
9.6%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.8%
MDYV
6.3%

Energy

IVOV
6.8%
MDYV
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
4.9%
MDYV
4.9%

Utilities

IVOV
4.0%
MDYV
4.0%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.8%
MDYV
3.8%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
MDYV
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. MDYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. MDYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVMDYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.12

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

7.31

0.00

IVOV vs. MDYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the MDYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and MDYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. MDYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum MDYV drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and MDYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVMDYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-60.71%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-10.53%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-22.58%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-22.58%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-45.90%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.81%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-8.60%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.05%

+0.01%

Volatility

IVOV vs. MDYV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVMDYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.87%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

10.71%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

15.39%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

19.45%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

21.91%

-0.17%

IVOV vs. MDYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MDYV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. MDYV - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than MDYV's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.64%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.71%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, IVOV and MDYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MDYV has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to IVOV (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs MDYV's -60.71%.

On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.90% vs 10.84% for MDYV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 10.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.64% for IVOV.

Both ETFs track S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.15% for MDYV.

IVOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and MDYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer