PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 22.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCV having a 10.54% annualized return and SMLV not far behind at 10.42%.


IMCV

1D
-0.59%
1M
4.45%
6M
10.82%
YTD
14.96%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
9.85%

SMLV

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.61%
6M
15.91%
YTD
22.24%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCV vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
14.96%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
22.24%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and SMLV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013

0.84

The correlation between IMCV and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCV vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
SMLV

Financial Services

17.7%
30.9%

Industrials

11.6%
14.3%

Energy

11.4%
1.5%

Healthcare

10.3%
8.9%

Utilities

10.1%
2.7%

Technology

9.3%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.0%

Real Estate

5.5%
11.9%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.3%

Financial Services

IMCV
17.7%
SMLV
30.9%

Industrials

IMCV
11.6%
SMLV
14.3%

Energy

IMCV
11.4%
SMLV
1.5%

Healthcare

IMCV
10.3%
SMLV
8.9%

Utilities

IMCV
10.1%
SMLV
2.7%

Technology

IMCV
9.3%
SMLV
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
8.6%
SMLV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
8.4%
SMLV
9.0%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.5%
SMLV
11.9%

Basic Materials

IMCV
4.8%
SMLV
3.3%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.4%
SMLV
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCV vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVSMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.90

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

10.99

+1.95

IMCV vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than SMLV's maximum drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVSMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-42.45%

-22.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.34%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-20.40%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-20.40%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

-42.45%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.59%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-5.41%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.60%

-0.75%

Volatility

IMCV vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 2.88%, while SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVSMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.75%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

10.09%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

15.46%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

18.23%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

20.91%

-1.36%

IMCV vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCV vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than SMLV's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.84%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.23%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCV and SMLV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to IMCV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.54% vs 10.42% for SMLV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.84% for IMCV.

IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.12% for SMLV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer