PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. SMLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. SMLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SMLV having a 16.87% return and SMLF slightly higher at 17.27%. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has underperformed SMLF with an annualized return of 10.73%, while SMLF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
0.01%
1M
3.13%
YTD
16.87%
6M
14.82%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
10.73%

SMLF

1D
0.39%
1M
4.30%
YTD
17.27%
6M
14.40%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. SMLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
16.87%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
17.27%12.30%16.33%19.99%-12.19%26.53%8.38%21.56%-8.42%12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and SMLF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.84

The correlation between SMLV and SMLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. SMLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
SMLF

Financial Services

30.4%
14.3%

Industrials

14.2%
19.5%

Real Estate

12.3%
5.6%

Technology

11.7%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
11.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.5%

Utilities

2.8%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.2%

Energy

1.6%
4.3%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.4%
SMLF
14.3%

Industrials

SMLV
14.2%
SMLF
19.5%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.3%
SMLF
5.6%

Technology

SMLV
11.7%
SMLF
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.9%
SMLF
11.4%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
SMLF
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.0%
SMLF
3.3%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.4%
SMLF
4.5%

Utilities

SMLV
2.8%
SMLF
2.0%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
SMLF
3.2%

Energy

SMLV
1.6%
SMLF
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. SMLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. SMLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVSMLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.96

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

13.58

-3.21

SMLV vs. SMLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the SMLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and SMLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. SMLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, roughly equal to the maximum SMLF drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and SMLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVSMLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-41.89%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.71%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-26.28%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-26.28%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-41.89%

-0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

0.00%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-6.58%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.53%

+0.12%

Volatility

SMLV vs. SMLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.46%, while iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVSMLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

5.25%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

12.90%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

17.62%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

21.12%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

21.82%

-0.86%

SMLV vs. SMLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLV vs. SMLF - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than SMLF's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
1.01%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.88%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and SMLF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLF has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to SMLV (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs SMLF's -41.89%.

On 10-year performance, SMLF leads with 12.77% vs 10.73% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SMLF.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.01% for SMLF.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SMLF is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while SMLF tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.30% for SMLF.

SMLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and SMLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer