PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.73%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
0.01%
1M
3.13%
YTD
16.87%
6M
14.82%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
10.73%

SCHG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
2.76%
6M
2.11%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
18.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
16.87%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.76%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and SCHG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013

0.58

The correlation between SMLV and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLV vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
SCHG

Financial Services

30.4%
6.6%

Industrials

14.2%
6.0%

Real Estate

12.3%
0.5%

Technology

11.7%
46.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
12.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.6%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.3%

Utilities

2.8%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
15.3%

Energy

1.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.4%
SCHG
6.6%

Industrials

SMLV
14.2%
SCHG
6.0%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.3%
SCHG
0.5%

Technology

SMLV
11.7%
SCHG
46.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.9%
SCHG
12.4%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
SCHG
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.0%
SCHG
1.6%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.4%
SCHG
1.3%

Utilities

SMLV
2.8%
SCHG
0.4%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
SCHG
15.3%

Energy

SMLV
1.6%
SCHG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

1.28

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

4.19

+6.17

SMLV vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-34.59%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-16.41%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-23.39%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-34.59%

+14.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-34.59%

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-5.16%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-5.20%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.00%

-2.35%

Volatility

SMLV vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.46%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

5.78%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

12.50%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

16.21%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

22.37%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

21.61%

-0.65%

SMLV vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLV vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.88%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and SCHG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to SMLV (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.81% vs 10.73% for SMLV. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.81% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.04% for SCHG.

SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer