PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 17.54% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 14.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCV having a 10.76% annualized return and IVOV not far behind at 10.50%.


IMCV

1D
0.47%
1M
2.86%
6M
13.16%
YTD
17.54%
1Y
28.34%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
9.94%

IVOV

1D
0.91%
1M
1.76%
6M
9.08%
YTD
14.20%
1Y
23.96%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.50%
ALL TIME*
11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.47M$2.33M$2.03M
$951.75K$1.11M$1.61M

IMCV vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
17.54%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
14.20%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and IVOV is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.89

The correlation between IMCV and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCV vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
IVOV

Financial Services

17.7%
21.8%

Industrials

11.6%
19.2%

Energy

11.4%
6.3%

Healthcare

10.3%
3.8%

Utilities

10.1%
4.0%

Technology

9.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
13.9%

Real Estate

5.5%
9.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
5.7%

Communication Services

2.4%
0.8%

Financial Services

IMCV
17.7%
IVOV
21.8%

Industrials

IMCV
11.6%
IVOV
19.2%

Energy

IMCV
11.4%
IVOV
6.3%

Healthcare

IMCV
10.3%
IVOV
3.8%

Utilities

IMCV
10.1%
IVOV
4.0%

Technology

IMCV
9.3%
IVOV
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
8.6%
IVOV
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
8.4%
IVOV
13.9%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.5%
IVOV
9.5%

Basic Materials

IMCV
4.8%
IVOV
5.7%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.4%
IVOV
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

2.27

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.79

8.10

+7.69

IMCV vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-45.99%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-10.58%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-22.61%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-22.61%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

-45.99%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.31%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-5.38%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.96%

-1.16%

Volatility

IMCV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 2.99%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.42%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

10.38%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

14.90%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

19.27%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

21.65%

-2.10%

IMCV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than IVOV's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.80%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.60%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCV and IVOV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOV has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to IMCV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 10-year performance, IMCV leads with 10.76% vs 10.50% for IVOV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCV has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.60% for IVOV.

IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.10% for IVOV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer