PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 8.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCV having a 10.40% annualized return and IVOV not far ahead at 10.41%.


IMCV

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.96%
6M
11.32%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.40%

IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCV vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
9.96%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and IVOV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.89

The correlation between IMCV and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCV vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
IVOV

Financial Services

15.6%
21.9%

Energy

12.5%
7.4%

Industrials

12.1%
18.8%

Utilities

10.0%
4.2%

Technology

9.1%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
13.5%

Healthcare

8.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.5%
6.0%

Real Estate

5.6%
9.6%

Communication Services

2.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

IMCV
15.6%
IVOV
21.9%

Energy

IMCV
12.5%
IVOV
7.4%

Industrials

IMCV
12.1%
IVOV
18.8%

Utilities

IMCV
10.0%
IVOV
4.2%

Technology

IMCV
9.1%
IVOV
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
8.9%
IVOV
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
8.7%
IVOV
13.5%

Healthcare

IMCV
8.5%
IVOV
3.5%

Basic Materials

IMCV
6.5%
IVOV
6.0%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.6%
IVOV
9.6%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.5%
IVOV
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMCVIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.97

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

6.80

+5.92

IMCV vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMCVIVOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.37

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.39

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.48

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.58

-0.10

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-45.99%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-10.58%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-22.61%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-22.61%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

-45.99%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.31%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-5.43%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

3.07%

-1.22%

Volatility

IMCV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 2.56%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

4.07%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

10.61%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

15.27%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

19.48%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.66%

21.73%

-2.07%

IMCV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than IVOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.94%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IMCV and IVOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to IMCV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.41% vs 10.40% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.67% for IVOV.

IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.10% for IVOV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer