PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILCB vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILCB vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ILCB having a 8.52% return and SPYG slightly higher at 8.70%. Over the past 10 years, ILCB has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 14.97%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.


ILCB

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
8.52%
6M
7.55%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
14.97%

SPYG

1D
-2.40%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.70%
6M
7.46%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILCB vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
8.52%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ILCB and SPYG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004

0.92

The correlation between ILCB and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILCB vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ILCB
SPYG

Technology

38.9%
52.1%

Financial Services

11.4%
9.0%

Communication Services

9.9%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
8.5%

Industrials

8.4%
5.4%

Healthcare

8.4%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.0%

Energy

3.1%
0.1%

Utilities

2.6%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.6%

Technology

ILCB
38.9%
SPYG
52.1%

Financial Services

ILCB
11.4%
SPYG
9.0%

Communication Services

ILCB
9.9%
SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ILCB
9.3%
SPYG
8.5%

Industrials

ILCB
8.4%
SPYG
5.4%

Healthcare

ILCB
8.4%
SPYG
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

ILCB
4.5%
SPYG
1.0%

Energy

ILCB
3.1%
SPYG
0.1%

Utilities

ILCB
2.6%
SPYG
1.2%

Basic Materials

ILCB
1.8%
SPYG
0.3%

Real Estate

ILCB
1.7%
SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILCB vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILCB vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILCBSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.96

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

7.79

+3.87

ILCB vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILCB and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILCB vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILCB drawdown since its inception was -51.53%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILCB and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILCBSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.53%

-67.63%

+16.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-13.76%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-22.14%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-32.67%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

-32.67%

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-5.52%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-24.28%

+18.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.46%

-1.41%

Volatility

ILCB vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) is 4.82%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that ILCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILCBSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

7.26%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

13.90%

-3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

17.26%

-4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

21.36%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

20.73%

-2.53%

ILCB vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILCB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ILCB vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ILCB and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to ILCB (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILCB dropped -51.53% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.05% vs 14.97% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYG.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.

ILCB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for ILCB and 0.04% for SPYG.

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILCB and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer