IGV vs. VO
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.87%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for VO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
IGV vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -14.18% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 15.87%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -16.00%
- 1Y
- -15.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
IGV vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -14.18% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and VO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and VO has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
VO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
VO
Communication Services
IGV
VO
Financial Services
IGV
VO
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
VO
Industrials
IGV
VO
Basic Materials
IGV
-
VO
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
VO
Energy
IGV
-
VO
Healthcare
IGV
-
VO
Real Estate
IGV
-
VO
Utilities
IGV
-
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
VO
IGV vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.25 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.23 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 8.44 | -9.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -58.87% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -8.17% | -28.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -19.02% | -17.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -27.57% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -39.37% | -6.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.00% | -0.45% | -22.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -7.85% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.55% | 2.16% | +15.39% |
Volatility
IGV vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.57% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.31%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.57% | 4.31% | +8.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.80% | 9.71% | +15.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.06% | 12.74% | +15.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 17.65% | +10.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.39% | 18.96% | +7.43% |
IGV vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and VO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.87% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.03% for VO.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer