IGV vs. XSW
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index while XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 16.11%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for XSW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XSW.
Performance
IGV vs. XSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -10.30% return, which is significantly lower than XSW's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed XSW with an annualized return of 16.11%, while XSW has yielded a comparatively lower 13.56% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- -14.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 16.11%
XSW
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- 6M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- -8.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
IGV vs. XSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -10.30% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -3.95% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and XSW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IGV and XSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGV vs. XSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
XSW
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
XSW
Communication Services
IGV
XSW
Financial Services
IGV
XSW
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
XSW
Industrials
IGV
XSW
Basic Materials
IGV
-
XSW
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
XSW
-
Energy
IGV
-
XSW
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
XSW
Real Estate
IGV
-
XSW
-
Utilities
IGV
-
XSW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. XSW — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
XSW
IGV vs. XSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | XSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.98 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.24 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | -0.49 | -0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. XSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than XSW's maximum drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and XSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | XSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -45.38% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -33.75% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -33.75% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -45.38% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -45.38% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.51% | -12.42% | -7.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -9.88% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.43% | 16.59% | +1.84% |
Volatility
IGV vs. XSW - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) have volatilities of 9.17% and 8.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | XSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 8.97% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.48% | 24.55% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.71% | 29.25% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.07% | 29.02% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.40% | 26.29% | +0.11% |
IGV vs. XSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XSW's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. XSW - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while XSW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and XSW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to XSW (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs XSW's -45.38%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 16.11% vs 13.56% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 8.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 16.11% return vs 13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
IGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for XSW.
IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.35% for XSW.
XSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and XSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer