IGV vs. XSW
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index while XSW tracks the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.97%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for XSW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XSW.
Performance
IGV vs. XSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -13.53% return, which is significantly lower than XSW's -10.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has outperformed XSW with an annualized return of 15.97%, while XSW has yielded a comparatively lower 12.97% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- -13.53%
- 6M
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -14.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.97%
XSW
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- -10.80%
- 6M
- -11.46%
- 1Y
- -8.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.92%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
IGV vs. XSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -13.53% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | -10.80% | -0.90% | 25.81% | 38.60% | -34.22% | 7.47% | 52.41% | 36.50% | 7.67% | 27.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and XSW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IGV and XSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGV vs. XSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
XSW
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
XSW
Communication Services
IGV
XSW
Financial Services
IGV
XSW
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
XSW
Industrials
IGV
XSW
Basic Materials
IGV
-
XSW
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
XSW
-
Energy
IGV
-
XSW
-
Healthcare
IGV
-
XSW
Real Estate
IGV
-
XSW
-
Utilities
IGV
-
XSW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. XSW — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
XSW
IGV vs. XSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | XSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.97 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.27 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -0.56 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. XSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than XSW's maximum drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and XSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | XSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -45.38% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -33.75% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -33.75% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -45.38% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -45.38% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.42% | -18.67% | -3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -9.85% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.66% | 16.09% | +1.57% |
Volatility
IGV vs. XSW - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) at 11.11%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | XSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 11.11% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.89% | 23.82% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.15% | 28.77% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 28.85% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 26.28% | +0.13% |
IGV vs. XSW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XSW's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. XSW - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than XSW's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and XSW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to XSW (11.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs XSW's -45.38%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.97% vs 12.97% for XSW. On fees, XSW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSW has been the lower-risk option at 11.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
XSW has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.35% for XSW.
XSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and XSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer