IGV vs. VOO
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.70%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
IGV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGV having a 15.70% annualized return and VOO not far behind at 15.61%.
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
IGV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and VOO has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
VOO
Communication Services
IGV
VOO
Financial Services
IGV
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
VOO
Industrials
IGV
VOO
Basic Materials
IGV
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
VOO
Energy
IGV
-
VOO
Healthcare
IGV
-
VOO
Real Estate
IGV
-
VOO
Utilities
IGV
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
VOO
IGV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.35 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.67 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 11.96 | -12.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -33.99% | -29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -8.90% | -27.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -18.69% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -24.52% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -33.99% | -11.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.85% | -3.14% | -22.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -3.68% | -10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 1.99% | +15.95% |
Volatility
IGV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.71% | 4.83% | +7.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.86% | 9.82% | +15.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.27% | 12.46% | +15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 16.91% | +11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.38% | 18.02% | +8.36% |
IGV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.71%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.70% vs 15.61% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer