IGV vs. QQQ
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 16.11%/yr vs 21.54%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IGV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -10.30% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 16.11%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.54% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- -14.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 16.11%
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- YTD
- 17.94%
- 1Y
- 30.58%
- 3Y*
- 26.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.59%
- 10Y*
- 21.54%
IGV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -10.30% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.94% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and QQQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGV and QQQ has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IGV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGV
QQQ
Communication Services
IGV
QQQ
Financial Services
IGV
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
QQQ
Industrials
IGV
QQQ
Basic Materials
IGV
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
QQQ
Energy
IGV
-
QQQ
Healthcare
IGV
-
QQQ
Real Estate
IGV
-
QQQ
Utilities
IGV
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
QQQ
IGV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.30 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 2.57 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 9.33 | -10.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -82.97% | +19.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -11.96% | -24.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -22.77% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -35.12% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -35.12% | -10.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.51% | -3.02% | -16.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -32.69% | +18.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.43% | 3.29% | +15.14% |
Volatility
IGV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) is 9.17%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that IGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 9.93% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.48% | 15.11% | +10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.71% | 18.36% | +10.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.07% | 22.76% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.40% | 22.43% | +3.97% |
IGV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than QQQ's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and QQQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to IGV (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.54% vs 16.11% for IGV. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 9.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.54% return vs 16.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer