IGV vs. XLK
IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGV returned 15.97%/yr vs 25.39%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IGV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGV achieves a -13.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 29.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IGV has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 15.97%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.39% annualized return.
IGV
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- -13.53%
- 6M
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -14.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.97%
XLK
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- 29.66%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 54.30%
- 3Y*
- 30.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.99%
- 10Y*
- 25.39%
IGV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -13.53% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.66% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGV and XLK is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2001 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IGV and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGV vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGV
XLK
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGV
XLK
Communication Services
IGV
XLK
-
Financial Services
IGV
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGV
XLK
-
Industrials
IGV
XLK
Basic Materials
IGV
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
IGV
-
XLK
-
Energy
IGV
-
XLK
Healthcare
IGV
-
XLK
-
Real Estate
IGV
-
XLK
-
Utilities
IGV
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IGV
XLK
IGV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.40 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 3.43 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 11.03 | -11.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGV drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -82.05% | +18.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -15.92% | -20.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -25.66% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.85% | -33.56% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.85% | -33.56% | -12.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.42% | -5.94% | -16.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -34.92% | +20.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.66% | 4.94% | +12.72% |
Volatility
IGV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 11.60%. This indicates that IGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 11.60% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.89% | 19.22% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.15% | 22.96% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 25.27% | +2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 24.69% | +1.72% |
IGV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGV and XLK have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (12.58%) compared to XLK (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGV dropped -63.45% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.39% vs 15.97% for IGV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 11.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.39% return vs 15.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGV and 0.08% for XLK.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer