PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDV vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDV vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.85% return. Over the past 10 years, IDV has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 10.72%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.


IDV

1D
2.21%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
13.24%
6M
14.83%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
10.72%

NOBL

1D
0.75%
1M
3.77%
YTD
6.85%
6M
6.04%
1Y
12.41%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDV vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
13.24%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
6.85%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IDV and NOBL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.68

The correlation between IDV and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDV vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDV
NOBL

Financial Services

30.1%
12.4%

Energy

15.6%
3.4%

Utilities

11.8%
6.4%

Communication Services

10.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
23.5%

Industrials

6.7%
20.3%

Basic Materials

5.8%
10.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
4.6%

Technology

0.9%
3.6%

Healthcare

-

9.7%

Financial Services

IDV
30.1%
NOBL
12.4%

Energy

IDV
15.6%
NOBL
3.4%

Utilities

IDV
11.8%
NOBL
6.4%

Communication Services

IDV
10.0%
NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDV
9.6%
NOBL
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDV
7.2%
NOBL
23.5%

Industrials

IDV
6.7%
NOBL
20.3%

Basic Materials

IDV
5.8%
NOBL
10.9%

Real Estate

IDV
2.4%
NOBL
4.6%

Technology

IDV
0.9%
NOBL
3.6%

Healthcare

IDV

-

NOBL
9.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDV vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDV vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDVNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.19

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

1.37

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.72

3.50

+12.21

IDV vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDV and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDV vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDVNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.14%

-35.43%

-34.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-9.11%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-15.36%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.19%

-17.92%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.50%

-35.43%

-7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-2.96%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-3.48%

-11.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

3.55%

-1.26%

Volatility

IDV vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.02%. This indicates that IDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDVNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

3.02%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

8.19%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

11.52%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

14.42%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

16.62%

+1.31%

IDV vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDV vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than NOBL's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.41%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.05%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDV and NOBL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDV has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to NOBL (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.72% vs 9.89% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 2.05% for NOBL.

IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.35% for NOBL.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDV and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer