IBDR vs. FLTR
IBDR (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IBDR tracks the Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index while FLTR tracks the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBDR returned 1.58%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
IBDR vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDR achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.19% return.
IBDR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
IBDR vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 1.69% | 4.99% | 4.98% | 5.96% | -8.28% | -1.79% | 8.88% | 14.81% | -2.80% | 5.96% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.19% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDR and FLTR is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDR vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
IBDR
FLTR
IBDR vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDR | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.36 | 3.03 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 52.23 | 16.82 | +35.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 181.59 | 98.58 | +83.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDR vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDR drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDR and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDR | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -17.84% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -0.31% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.08% | -1.93% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.13% | -3.06% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -0.67% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.05% | -0.03% |
Volatility
IBDR vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is 0.18%, while VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) has a volatility of 0.29%. This indicates that IBDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDR | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.29% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 0.66% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 0.80% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 2.13% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 5.00% | -0.15% |
IBDR vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDR vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 4.12% | 4.20% | 4.13% | 3.41% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.61% | 3.25% | 3.56% | 3.22% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDR and FLTR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTR has higher volatility (0.29%) compared to IBDR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDR dropped -16.06% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 5-year performance, FLTR leads with 4.55% vs 1.58% for IBDR. On fees, IBDR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 4.55% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.12% for IBDR.
IBDR tracks Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDR and 0.14% for FLTR.
IBDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 6.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDR and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer