IBDR vs. IBHF
IBDR (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF) and IBHF (iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares. IBDR is passively managed, while IBHF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBDR returned 1.57%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for IBHF. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHF.
Performance
IBDR vs. IBHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDR achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBHF's 0.54% return.
IBDR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
IBDR vs. IBHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 1.65% | 4.99% | 4.98% | 5.96% | -8.28% | -1.79% | 1.52% |
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 0.54% | 6.60% | 8.55% | 10.40% | -6.66% | 4.43% | 2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDR and IBHF is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2020 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBDR and IBHF has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDR vs. IBHF — Risk / Return Rank
IBDR
IBHF
IBDR vs. IBHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDR | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +10.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.36 | 1.47 | +1.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 52.23 | 5.62 | +46.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 181.59 | 18.04 | +163.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDR vs. IBHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDR drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, which is greater than IBHF's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDR and IBHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDR | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -11.19% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -0.75% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.08% | -2.53% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.13% | -11.19% | -1.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.45% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -1.79% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.23% | -0.21% |
Volatility
IBDR vs. IBHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is 0.18%, while iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that IBDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDR | IBHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.47% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 1.22% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 1.91% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 5.79% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 5.64% | -0.79% |
IBDR vs. IBHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDR vs. IBHF - Dividend Comparison
IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than IBHF's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 4.13% | 4.20% | 4.13% | 3.41% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.61% | 3.25% | 3.56% | 3.22% | 0.86% |
IBHF iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.53% | 6.73% | 7.17% | 7.33% | 6.01% | 4.55% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDR and IBHF have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBHF has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to IBDR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDR dropped -16.06% vs IBHF's -11.19%.
On 5-year performance, IBHF leads with 3.98% vs 1.57% for IBDR. On fees, IBDR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBHF has performed better with a 3.98% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHF.
IBHF has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 4.13% for IBDR.
Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDR and 0.35% for IBHF.
IBDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDR and IBHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer