IBDR vs. BSCQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ).
IBDR and BSCQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBDR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2016. BSCQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016. Both IBDR and BSCQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBDR or BSCQ.
Correlation
The correlation between IBDR and BSCQ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IBDR vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IBDR:
2.94
BSCQ:
2.92
IBDR:
4.57
BSCQ:
4.39
IBDR:
1.63
BSCQ:
1.60
IBDR:
1.06
BSCQ:
1.04
IBDR:
19.19
BSCQ:
20.74
IBDR:
0.28%
BSCQ:
0.26%
IBDR:
1.80%
BSCQ:
1.81%
IBDR:
-16.06%
BSCQ:
-16.50%
IBDR:
-0.18%
BSCQ:
-0.23%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBDR having a 4.68% return and BSCQ slightly higher at 4.69%.
IBDR
4.68%
0.30%
3.37%
5.17%
1.85%
N/A
BSCQ
4.69%
0.31%
3.38%
5.13%
1.87%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBDR vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBDR and BSCQ have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBDR vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBDR vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than BSCQ's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 4.15% | 3.41% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.62% | 3.25% | 3.56% | 3.22% | 0.86% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 3.68% | 3.54% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 3.33% | 2.91% | 0.69% |
Drawdowns
IBDR vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDR drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, roughly equal to the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDR and BSCQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBDR vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is 0.40%, while Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) has a volatility of 0.44%. This indicates that IBDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.