PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDR vs. IBDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDR vs. IBDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDR achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBDU's 0.54% return.


IBDR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.86%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*

IBDU

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.73%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDR vs. IBDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBDR
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF
1.65%4.99%4.98%5.96%-8.28%-1.79%8.88%2.23%
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
0.54%7.59%3.62%8.67%-13.04%-2.05%10.38%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDR and IBDU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between IBDR and IBDU has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDR vs. IBDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDR
IBDR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IBDU
IBDU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IBDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDR vs. IBDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDRIBDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+11.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.36

1.38

+1.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

52.23

2.76

+49.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

181.59

10.13

+171.46

IBDR vs. IBDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDR Sharpe Ratio is 6.83, which is higher than the IBDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDR and IBDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDR vs. IBDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDR drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum IBDU drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDR and IBDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDRIBDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

-19.44%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.08%

-1.59%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.08%

-4.14%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.13%

-19.44%

+6.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.54%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-5.37%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.43%

-0.41%

Volatility

IBDR vs. IBDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is 0.18%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) has a volatility of 0.65%. This indicates that IBDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDRIBDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.65%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

1.56%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

2.22%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

5.71%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

7.29%

-2.44%

IBDR vs. IBDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBDR and IBDU have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDR vs. IBDU - Dividend Comparison

IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than IBDU's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBDR
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF
4.13%4.20%4.13%3.41%2.44%2.11%2.61%3.25%3.56%3.22%0.86%
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
4.66%4.67%4.75%4.21%3.34%2.29%2.42%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDR and IBDU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBDU has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to IBDR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDR dropped -16.06% vs IBDU's -19.44%.

On 5-year performance, IBDR leads with 1.57% vs 1.11% for IBDU. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IBDR has performed better with a 1.57% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDR and IBDU have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.13% for IBDR.

IBDR tracks Barclays December 2026 Maturity Corporate Index, while IBDU tracks Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index.

IBDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDR and IBDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer