PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDR vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDR achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.11% return.


IBDR

1D
0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.69%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*

FXNAX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDR
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF
1.69%4.99%4.98%5.96%-8.28%-1.79%8.88%14.81%-2.80%5.96%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.11%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDR and FXNAX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between IBDR and FXNAX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDR vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDR
IBDR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDRFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.36

1.20

+2.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

52.23

1.52

+50.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

181.59

4.36

+177.22

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDR Sharpe Ratio is 6.83, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDR and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDR drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDR and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDRFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

-19.51%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.08%

-2.94%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.08%

-6.16%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.13%

-18.54%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.17%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-3.86%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

1.02%

-1.00%

Volatility

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) is 0.18%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that IBDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDRFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

1.16%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.35%

2.90%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

3.92%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

6.08%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

5.01%

-0.16%

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDR vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

IBDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than FXNAX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.72%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%
IBDR
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF
4.12%4.20%4.13%3.41%2.44%2.11%2.61%3.25%3.56%3.22%0.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDR and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to IBDR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDR dropped -16.06% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

IBDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDR and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer