HERO vs. FVAL
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -2.11%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for FVAL. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FVAL.
Performance
HERO vs. FVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -11.80% return, which is significantly lower than FVAL's 12.26% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- 6M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- -14.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- -2.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.47%
FVAL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 28.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.44M | $3.65M | $2.95M | |
| $807.35K | $571.35K | $683.96K |
HERO vs. FVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -11.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 12.26% | 19.56% | 18.05% | 23.10% | -14.40% | 30.33% | 9.08% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and FVAL is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between HERO and FVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
HERO vs. FVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
FVAL
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HERO
FVAL
Technology
HERO
FVAL
Industrials
HERO
FVAL
Basic Materials
HERO
-
FVAL
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
FVAL
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
FVAL
Energy
HERO
-
FVAL
Financial Services
HERO
-
FVAL
Healthcare
HERO
-
FVAL
Real Estate
HERO
-
FVAL
Utilities
HERO
-
FVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. FVAL — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
FVAL
HERO vs. FVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | FVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.40 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 3.02 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 12.33 | -13.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. FVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than FVAL's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and FVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | FVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -37.26% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.78% | -8.92% | -21.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -18.39% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.42% | -23.42% | -23.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.78% | 0.00% | -25.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -4.54% | -21.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | 2.18% | +15.41% |
Volatility
HERO vs. FVAL - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) at 2.90%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | FVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 2.90% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 9.24% | +7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 12.16% | +8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 16.49% | +7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 18.03% | +6.42% |
HERO vs. FVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FVAL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. FVAL - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than FVAL's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 1.56% | 1.61% | 1.60% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.62% | 0.45% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.77% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and FVAL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to FVAL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs FVAL's -37.26%.
On 5-year performance, FVAL leads with 12.35% vs -2.11% for HERO. On fees, FVAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FVAL has performed better with a 12.35% return vs -2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FVAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.56% for FVAL.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.15% for FVAL.
FVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and FVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer