HERO vs. FVAL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -3.49%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for FVAL. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FVAL.

Performance

HERO vs. FVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -14.84% return, which is significantly lower than FVAL's 10.62% return.

HERO

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 2.80%
• 6M: -17.56%
• YTD: -14.84%
• 1Y: -17.58%
• 3Y*: 7.41%
• 5Y*: -3.49%
• 10Y*: —

FVAL

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 8.35%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 1Y: 25.01%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: 12.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HERO vs. FVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF	-14.84%	28.74%	17.65%	8.36%	-33.42%	-8.37%	91.02%	9.12%
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	10.62%	19.56%	18.05%	23.10%	-14.40%	30.33%	9.08%	7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between HERO and FVAL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.56

The correlation between HERO and FVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

HERO vs. FVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HERO	FVAL
Communication Services	91.6%	9.4%
Technology	7.0%	33.2%
Industrials	1.5%	8.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Energy	-	3.2%
Financial Services	-	12.8%
Healthcare	-	10.8%
Real Estate	-	2.6%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

HERO vs. FVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERO

HERO Risk / Return Rank: 3
HERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
HERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HERO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
HERO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FVAL

FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 79
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERO vs. FVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HERO	FVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	2.11	-3.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.16	2.91	-4.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.38	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	2.82	-3.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	11.50	-12.56

HERO vs. FVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERO Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the FVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERO and FVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HERO vs. FVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than FVAL's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and FVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HERO	FVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.02%	-37.26%	-16.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.78%	-8.92%	-21.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-18.39%	-12.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.57%	-23.42%	-23.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.34%	-1.21%	-27.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.01%	-4.56%	-21.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.55%	2.18%	+14.37%

Volatility

HERO vs. FVAL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) at 3.11%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HERO	FVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	3.11%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.72%	9.27%	+6.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.67%	11.95%	+7.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.40%	16.51%	+6.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.41%	18.06%	+6.35%

HERO vs. FVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FVAL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

HERO vs. FVAL - Dividend Comparison

HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FVAL's 1.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	1.58%	1.61%	1.60%	1.69%	1.79%	1.41%	1.61%	1.77%	2.06%	1.62%	0.45%
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF	1.83%	1.62%	1.06%	0.73%	0.28%	0.79%	0.71%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HERO and FVAL in my portfolio?

HERO and FVAL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HERO or FVAL?

HERO has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to FVAL (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs FVAL's -37.26%.

Which ETF is better, HERO or FVAL?

On 5-year performance, FVAL leads with 12.15% vs -3.49% for HERO. On fees, FVAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HERO or FVAL?

Over the 5-year period, FVAL has performed better with a 12.15% return vs -3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HERO or FVAL?

FVAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HERO or FVAL?

HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.58% for FVAL.

What is the main difference between HERO and FVAL?

HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.15% for FVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.