PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERO vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HERO vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HERO vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
-11.99%28.74%17.65%8.36%-33.42%-8.37%91.02%9.12%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
34.50%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%4.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 34.50% return.


HERO

1D
1.79%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
-11.99%
6M
-22.29%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
-3.15%
10Y*

XOM

1D
-5.23%
1M
4.25%
YTD
34.50%
6M
45.79%
1Y
39.70%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
27.68%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERO vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERO
HERO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERO vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEROXOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

1.57

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.47

2.04

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.27

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

2.48

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.64

6.44

-5.81

HERO vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERO Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERO and XOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEROXOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.57

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

1.05

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.48

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between HERO and XOM is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HERO vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than XOM's 2.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
1.84%1.62%1.06%0.73%0.28%0.79%0.71%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.51%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Drawdowns

HERO vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and XOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HEROXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.02%

-62.40%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.64%

-15.79%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.09%

-20.51%

-28.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.94%

-6.23%

-19.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.97%

-10.20%

-15.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.44%

6.18%

+4.26%

Volatility

HERO vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) is 7.63%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that HERO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HEROXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

8.47%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

17.04%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

25.43%

-3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.42%

26.57%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.63%

27.93%

-3.30%