HERO vs. GAMR
HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) and GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERO returned -2.11%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GAMR. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HERO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GAMR.
Performance
HERO vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HERO achieves a -11.80% return, which is significantly lower than GAMR's 3.02% return.
HERO
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- 6M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- -14.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- -2.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.47%
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $69.51K | $68.28K | $108.93K | |
| $807.35K | $571.35K | $683.96K |
HERO vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -11.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.02% | 39.20% | 11.23% | 6.89% | -36.96% | 11.31% | 76.83% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERO and GAMR is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between HERO and GAMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HERO vs. GAMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERO
GAMR
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
HERO
GAMR
Technology
HERO
GAMR
Industrials
HERO
GAMR
-
Basic Materials
HERO
-
GAMR
-
Consumer Cyclical
HERO
-
GAMR
Consumer Defensive
HERO
-
GAMR
-
Energy
HERO
-
GAMR
-
Financial Services
HERO
-
GAMR
Healthcare
HERO
-
GAMR
-
Real Estate
HERO
-
GAMR
-
Utilities
HERO
-
GAMR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERO vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
HERO
GAMR
HERO vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 0.16 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 0.35 | -1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERO vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERO drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, roughly equal to the maximum GAMR drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERO and GAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.02% | -55.37% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.78% | -29.36% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -29.36% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.42% | -50.57% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.78% | -14.16% | -11.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -22.03% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | 13.55% | +4.04% |
Volatility
HERO vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) at 6.33%. This indicates that HERO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERO | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 6.33% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 19.39% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 23.84% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 24.67% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 24.38% | +0.07% |
HERO vs. GAMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GAMR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERO vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than GAMR's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.77% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERO and GAMR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to GAMR (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERO dropped -54.02% vs GAMR's -55.37%.
On 5-year performance, GAMR leads with 0.86% vs -2.11% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GAMR has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 0.86% return vs -2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GAMR.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.50% for GAMR.
HERO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GAMR is Gaming. HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index, while GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HERO and 0.59% for GAMR.
GAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERO and GAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer