HDV vs. GSIE
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while GSIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.50%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for GSIE. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
HDV vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than GSIE's 8.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HDV having a 9.50% annualized return and GSIE not far behind at 9.39%.
HDV
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.85%
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.98M | $19.56M | $19.60M | |
| $163.75M | $142.23M | $95.79M |
HDV vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 20.12% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.75% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 26.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and GSIE is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and GSIE has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDV vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
GSIE
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
GSIE
Healthcare
HDV
GSIE
Energy
HDV
GSIE
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
GSIE
Utilities
HDV
GSIE
Communication Services
HDV
GSIE
Financial Services
HDV
GSIE
Industrials
HDV
GSIE
Technology
HDV
GSIE
Basic Materials
HDV
GSIE
Real Estate
HDV
-
GSIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
GSIE
HDV vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 1.58 | +3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 5.99 | +6.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than GSIE's maximum drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -34.63% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -10.76% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -13.07% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -29.97% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -34.63% | -2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.06% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -5.99% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.84% | -0.95% |
Volatility
HDV vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) at 3.56%. This indicates that HDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 3.56% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 12.39% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 14.49% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 16.08% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 16.49% | -0.72% |
HDV vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDV vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than GSIE's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and GSIE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to GSIE (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.50% vs 9.39% for GSIE. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.56% for GSIE.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.25% for GSIE.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer