HDV vs. VYM
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both Dividend funds - HDV tracks the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index while VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.44%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
HDV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 9.44%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 13.95%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 23.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
HDV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 13.95% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 11.42% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and VYM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and VYM has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
VYM
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
VYM
Healthcare
HDV
VYM
Energy
HDV
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
VYM
Utilities
HDV
VYM
Communication Services
HDV
VYM
Financial Services
HDV
VYM
Industrials
HDV
VYM
Basic Materials
HDV
VYM
Technology
HDV
VYM
Real Estate
HDV
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
VYM
HDV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.45 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 12.83 | -1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -56.98% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -6.69% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -14.46% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -15.84% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -35.21% | -1.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.37% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -7.18% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.80% | +0.09% |
Volatility
HDV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.89%. This indicates that HDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 2.89% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 7.64% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.93% | 10.37% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 13.93% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 16.32% | -0.59% |
HDV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than VYM's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.30% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and VYM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to VYM (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.97% vs 9.44% for HDV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for HDV.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.30% for VYM.
HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer