HDV vs. SPY
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.31%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
HDV vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.31%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
HDV vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.57% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and SPY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HDV and SPY has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HDV vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
SPY
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
SPY
Healthcare
HDV
SPY
Energy
HDV
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
SPY
Utilities
HDV
SPY
Communication Services
HDV
SPY
Financial Services
HDV
SPY
Industrials
HDV
SPY
Basic Materials
HDV
SPY
Technology
HDV
SPY
Real Estate
HDV
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
SPY
HDV vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.01 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 13.54 | -3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -55.19% | +18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -8.88% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -18.76% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -24.50% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -33.72% | -3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -1.75% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -9.04% | +5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.97% | -0.08% |
Volatility
HDV vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.37%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 4.64% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 9.75% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 12.43% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 17.14% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 17.99% | -2.25% |
HDV vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDV vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.94% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and SPY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to HDV (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 9.31% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 9.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while SPY is S&P 500. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer