GVUS vs. GSEW
GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVUS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSEW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs 18.80% for GSEW. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSEW.
Performance
GVUS vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than GSEW's 9.52% return.
GVUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSEW
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- —
GVUS vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 14.24% | 15.90% | 14.08% | 5.51% |
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.52% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVUS and GSEW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GVUS and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVUS vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVUS
GSEW
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
GVUS
GSEW
Technology
GVUS
GSEW
Industrials
GVUS
GSEW
Healthcare
GVUS
GSEW
Communication Services
GVUS
GSEW
Consumer Cyclical
GVUS
GSEW
Consumer Defensive
GVUS
GSEW
Energy
GVUS
GSEW
Utilities
GVUS
GSEW
Real Estate
GVUS
GSEW
Basic Materials
GVUS
GSEW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVUS vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank
GVUS
GSEW
GVUS vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVUS | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.27 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 2.45 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | 9.35 | +8.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVUS | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 1.56 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.61 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
GVUS vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum GSEW drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and GSEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVUS | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -38.65% | +22.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -7.72% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.66% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -5.89% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 2.02% | -0.42% |
Volatility
GVUS vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.76%. This indicates that GVUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVUS | GSEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.76% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 9.05% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 12.12% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 16.91% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 19.20% | -5.92% |
GVUS vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GVUS vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison
GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than GSEW's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% |
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, GVUS and GSEW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GVUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to GSEW (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs GSEW's -38.65%.
On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 28.22% vs 18.80% for GSEW. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 28.22% return vs 18.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.
GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.42% for GSEW.
GVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.09% for GSEW.
GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVUS and GSEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer