PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVUS vs. GSLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVUS vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 5.86% return.


GVUS

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.38%
YTD
15.43%
6M
14.79%
1Y
28.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSLC

1D
-1.22%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
5.86%
6M
4.87%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVUS vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
15.43%15.90%14.08%5.51%
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
5.86%16.17%24.21%5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and GSLC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.79

The correlation between GVUS and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVUS vs. GSLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVUS
GSLC

Technology

18.7%
37.5%

Financial Services

18.4%
10.8%

Industrials

12.6%
8.3%

Healthcare

10.6%
8.8%

Communication Services

8.1%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
5.7%

Energy

6.3%
3.3%

Utilities

4.0%
2.4%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.2%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.4%

Technology

GVUS
18.7%
GSLC
37.5%

Financial Services

GVUS
18.4%
GSLC
10.8%

Industrials

GVUS
12.6%
GSLC
8.3%

Healthcare

GVUS
10.6%
GSLC
8.8%

Communication Services

GVUS
8.1%
GSLC
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GVUS
7.2%
GSLC
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

GVUS
6.7%
GSLC
5.7%

Energy

GVUS
6.3%
GSLC
3.3%

Utilities

GVUS
4.0%
GSLC
2.4%

Real Estate

GVUS
3.9%
GSLC
1.2%

Basic Materials

GVUS
3.6%
GSLC
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVUS vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVUS vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVUSGSLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.29

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

2.05

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.63

8.86

+8.77

GVUS vs. GSLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the GSLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVUS and GSLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and GSLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVUSGSLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-33.69%

+17.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-9.49%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-3.08%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-4.38%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.19%

-0.58%

Volatility

GVUS vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 3.89%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVUSGSLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

4.60%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

9.67%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

12.28%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

16.71%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.33%

17.70%

-4.37%

GVUS vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GVUS vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than GSLC's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.95%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.56%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVUS and GSLC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSLC has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to GVUS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs GSLC's -33.69%.

On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 28.38% vs 19.37% for GSLC. On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 28.38% return vs 19.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.

GVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.95% for GSLC.

GVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GSLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.09% for GSLC.

GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVUS and GSLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer