GVUS vs. COF
GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while COF (Capital One Financial Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs -7.87% for COF. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GVUS vs. COF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than COF's -26.12% return.
GVUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COF
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- -26.12%
- 6M
- -21.20%
- 1Y
- -7.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
GVUS vs. COF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 14.24% | 15.90% | 14.08% | 5.51% |
COF Capital One Financial Corporation | -26.12% | 37.65% | 38.24% | 17.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVUS and COF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between GVUS and COF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVUS vs. COF — Risk / Return Rank
GVUS
COF
GVUS vs. COF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Capital One Financial Corporation (COF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVUS | COF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.98 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | -0.25 | +4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | -0.52 | +18.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVUS | COF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | -0.26 | +2.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.29 | +1.26 |
Drawdowns
GVUS vs. COF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum COF drawdown of -90.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and COF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVUS | COF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -90.17% | +74.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -31.47% | +24.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -30.58% | +30.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -21.49% | +19.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 15.25% | -13.65% |
Volatility
GVUS vs. COF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 3.01%, while Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVUS | COF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 7.49% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 24.55% | -16.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 30.83% | -19.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 35.32% | -22.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 37.25% | -23.97% |
Dividends
GVUS vs. COF - Dividend Comparison
GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than COF's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COF Capital One Financial Corporation | 1.69% | 1.07% | 1.35% | 1.83% | 2.58% | 1.79% | 1.01% | 1.55% | 2.12% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 2.08% |
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVUS and COF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COF has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to GVUS (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs COF's -90.17%.
GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVUS and COF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer