PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVUS vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVUS vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 18.16% return.


GVUS

1D
0.40%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.29%
YTD
20.44%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.48%

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M
$3.81M$1.84M$668.69K

GVUS vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
20.44%15.90%14.08%5.51%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and FDL is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between GVUS and FDL has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GVUS vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVUS
FDL

Technology

19.6%
4.3%

Financial Services

19.3%
13.7%

Healthcare

12.6%
11.7%

Industrials

10.3%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
24.3%

Energy

6.1%
11.1%

Utilities

3.9%
15.4%

Real Estate

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
11.2%

Technology

GVUS
19.6%
FDL
4.3%

Financial Services

GVUS
19.3%
FDL
13.7%

Healthcare

GVUS
12.6%
FDL
11.7%

Industrials

GVUS
10.3%
FDL
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GVUS
10.2%
FDL
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

GVUS
7.3%
FDL
24.3%

Energy

GVUS
6.1%
FDL
11.1%

Utilities

GVUS
3.9%
FDL
15.4%

Real Estate

GVUS
3.8%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

GVUS
3.5%
FDL
0.4%

Communication Services

GVUS
3.2%
FDL
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVUS vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVUS vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVUSFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

6.29

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.95

14.86

+5.09

GVUS vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVUS and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVUSFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-65.93%

+50.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-4.27%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.96%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-9.59%

+7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.81%

-0.25%

Volatility

GVUS vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 2.93%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVUSFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

4.96%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

8.97%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

11.95%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

14.44%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

17.16%

-3.95%

GVUS vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVUS vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than FDL's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.49%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVUS and FDL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to GVUS (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 32.63% vs 27.65% for FDL. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 32.63% return vs 27.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.49% for GVUS.

GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.43% for FDL.

GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVUS and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer